Talk:Shake It

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shake It article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Shake It (Metro Station song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. The analytics provided by Shhhnotsoloud demonstrate that the criteria at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC are satisfied. Sceptre (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– 12 years after its release, it remains highly notable - and more so than all the other songs combined (plus the EP).[1] Unreal7 (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. b uidhe 17:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I don't see any WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this title, esp. with Shake It (Iain Matthews song) and Shake It (Sakis Rouvas song) being pretty lenghty articles (for songs) too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think it hits the threshold for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, it's the most popular page with the title but not extravagantly so.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as there is WP:NOPRIMARY and this move will only add confusion. -- Netoholic @ 02:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pageviews (smoothed to "monthly" [2]) indicate this is the clear primary topic by usage. I don't understand how other editors above could misinterpret this. It definitely hits the threshold of more popular than everything else put together. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Length of article is not a primary topic criterion, and the only evidence provided (in Shhhnotsoloud's !vote) indicate the primary topic threshold has been hit. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move. The pageview analysis is compelling. --Bsherr (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.