This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Someone should translate the German article. It would be a great improvement for this one. Thanks J —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.70.205.67 (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bother, I'll write the whole thing myself.SimonKTemplar (talk) 01:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Đurađ II of Zeta?

That Strahinja was Đurađ II of Zeta is not at all an agreement of 'most historians' as the article claims. The reference is not a serious one and in fact says just the opposite - that the dissimilarities between Strahinja and Đurađ II of Zeta are too many to be assumed the same person. The Serbian Wikipedia article aslo does not make any of such claims. --Bezvardis (talk) 12:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the referenced source is not RS. The similarities which are presented in the article are copied from some scholarly work (I am sure I have read similar text in some book). I propose to replace "most historians" expression with something like "some historians". --Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

strahinja

hoi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.80.86.54 (talk) 11:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]