Talk:Subiaco, Lazio
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 17 December 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Subiaco. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Spelling
[edit]Isn’t this a British spelling article? The first version (largely taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia, as it happens), uses favour and favourite. —Ian Spackman 08:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 17 December 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Clear primary topic based on wikinav stats and long term significance.Traumnovelle (talk) 23:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Pageviews show WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. Theparties (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why would Subiaco Oval be relevant here? The name isn't Subiaco it is Subiaco Oval. And plenty of pages are a primary topic but get less significantly less page views: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] just to provide a few examples where WP:PT2 has taken precedence over views. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Theparties. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.