Talk:SystemRescue
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
there are no references yet
[edit]someone needs to fix that.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirmentio (talk • contribs) 01:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I would need some expansion on this page. It is a bit small, while it could really be crammed with information. It is not one that deserves to be a stub. Freedom to share 16:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I think I did enough expansion, so I removed the stub label.Freedom to share 15:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
It would be useful to say that SystemRescueCD supports GUID Partition Table (GPT) and has the utility gdisk as well as fdisk which can along with GNU Parted be used with GPT disks. marc (talk) 09:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
SystemRescueCD no longer uses Firefox, instead it has switched to Midori. I believe this changed in version 2.5. --Analogrival (talk) 15:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
License
[edit]It says "Various" for license in the article. Maybe I'm not looking hard enough, but I can't find any license info from the website at all. Does that automatically mean "various" or should it be something else? Just curious, thank you! :D ZeniffMartineau (talk) 05:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Found by User:Fuhghettaboutit and added by this edit. It's at the very bottom of the homepage; I can't believe I missed it! 
Facepalm --Anon126 (talk - contribs) 06:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- I totally missed it too, haha! Thanks! :P ZeniffMartineau (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Article says only x64, but i686 images are available from the download page
[edit]I've taken out the offending text (seems to have been added 2019-02-21 and 2019-05-06); if I've misunderstood the download page and am wrong, please let me know. --mathieu ottawa (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Version changes
[edit]We are at 11.00 now. The page also said that the i686 (32-bit) version was available up to 9.06. I could find no downloadable version of that; the images only go up to 9.03. I've adjusted the page accordingly. I did not update the screenshot, though this would be nice to do for completeness. I'm pretty sure 11.00 actually looks the same as 10.00, seeing as how it's not a distro that relies on its snazzy looks, but I haven't compared it pixel by pixel. 86.90.240.85 (talk) 22:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)