Talk:TR-069

Can any 1 tell me the reason for this e

java.lang.NullPointerException 12:45:49,821 SEVERE [ACSServerEJB] remoteDiagnosis.exception.ClientNotFoundException: Client doesn't exist. 12:45:49,823 ERROR [LogInterceptor] RuntimeException in method: public abstract java.lang.String ACSReceiver.ACSServer.setResponse(java.util.Properties,java.lang.String) throws java.rmi.RemoteException,mclient.rm.wrapper.TR069.exception.TR069Exception: mclient.rm.wrapper.TR069.exception.TR069Exception: error get message at ACSReceiver.ACSServerEJB.setResponse(ACSServerEJB.java:277)

Read the message. It says "NullPointerException" so go look for somewhere where you might get a Null Pointer. It also says "Client doesn't exist" so think about reason why that might happen. Otherwise, I have no idea at all. You are better off asking at the computing ref desk for this kind of question. Astronaut (talk) 21:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transport Details

IMHO the section needs much rephrasing and grammar corrections. I'm sure it can be made a bit more clear as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.34.247 (talk) 09:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article rename

I think the article should be called "CPE WAN Management Protocol" and that CWMP and TR-069 should redirect to it.

Look at the article "Hypertext Transfer Protocol". CWMP is an abbreviation like HTTP and TR-069 is the current technical report describing it much like RFC 2616 is for HTTP/1.1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.136.58.100 (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Examples of ISPs using this?

I've lived in the US and Europe for a substantial amount of time, and I've never had an ISP that used this... despite the claim by BF CEO that "a quarter of all broadband lines on the planet are managed by TR-069". So, can we have some concrete examples of ISPs using this protocol? Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might have missed it... I use Swisscom, and they definitely use TR-069. As well as other TR's, by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.192.70.135 (talk) 20:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

I think the article lacks a paragraph about criticism of the protocol and it's usage by ISPs, because essentially, TR-069 is a standardized backdoor into your home network. Form a network admins perspective, any internet or ISP-reachable device with this protocol enabled has the ability to totally compromise your network. The german version of this article has a few sentences about this, however it is hard to find any credible sources apart from this defcon talk because this is all essentially in the spec. 217.86.92.99 (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]