Talk:Virginia Port Authority

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Virginia Port Authority article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Norfolk, Virginia	Portsmouth, Virginia	Newport News, Virginia

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comments

I am planning to work on this article, which needs to be updated in light of several recent events and the future outlook regarding the impact of the Panama Canal widening project which is underway and is nearing completion. Any fellow Wikipedians who may wish to collaborate with me, please feel free to let me know. Thanks. Vaoverland (talk) 11:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Future

Among activities/developments:

1. The recent lease of the massive intermodal terminal at Portsmouth
2. Capacity expansion underway at the Norfolk International Terminal
3. The move of the railroad line which runs from the harbor to Suffolk from dozens of grade crossings in neighborhoods
4. As I mentioned in earlier thread, when the Panama Canal widening project opens, a 15 year project which is now less than 5 years away, VPA's port facilities at Hampton Roads (unless someone else really scrambles with improvements) join Baltimore (170 miles from open ocean) as the only ones on the U.S. East Coast which can handle the greater draft (channel depth) and height clearance needed for the larger ships which have come into use in recent years (which have double the container capacity). Such ships mostly originating in Asia currently can only call at West Coast U.S. ports. Currently, Asia originating container traffic bound for the mid-section of the U.S. (think of Ohio as the center of these destinations) now typically arrives at ports such as Los Angeles and Long Beach, and then crosses 2/3 of the width of the country on land via rail (mostly on UP and BNSF). By using the canal and east coast ports, potentially a lot of shipping expense for the rail portion to destinations can be saved. The states, including Virginia, the U.S. federal government, NS and CSX are also keenly aware of the above future potential. A combination of federal state and railroad funds are being used to improve trackage (no small issue as tunnel and bridge clearances across the Blue Ridge and Allegheny Mountains are involved). Also, new intermodal yard capacities are being added by both major railroads in Ohio. In general, both Norfolk Southern and CSX are very conservative with their investments, so I believe seeing their approach to this (and the millions they are spending) is an affirmation of the liklihod of the increased traffic at potential at Hampton Roads.

I am working to incorporate the above information (with proper references) into the article itself. I would appreciate any help from fellow Wikipedians. Vaoverland (talk) 07:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Virginia Port Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721055325/http://www.acp.gob.pa/eng/plan/documentos/propuesta/acp-expansion-proposal.pdf to http://www.acp.gob.pa/eng/plan/documentos/propuesta/acp-expansion-proposal.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]