Template talk:Futurama episodes

Categories

Category:Futurama does not belong here since an episode sould not be in the category:Futurama episodes and Category:Futurama. Jon513 11:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Layout

I feel the old style is way, way too clustered and messy. I don't think naming every episode is really that necessary, especially since each episode page has the list of that season's episodes in the main infobox. This way it's a lot smaller and just as organized, if they want to see each name they can go to the List of Futurama episodes page. -th1rt3en 00:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Episode identification

I think it should use the episode number rather than the production code. This is a navigation box and I would think that the episode number would be the easiest identification of the episode. -th1rt3en 23:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Movies

I see the titles of the movies have been added here a few times and reverted a few times, and not just by me! I just wanted to remind everyone that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until the names of the upcoming films have been released by a Reliable Source, something that the forum of IMDb is not regardless of whether the person posting is or is not Maurice LaMarche, the names should not be included in this template. The new articles for the films also should not be created until more is known than "IMDb says this will be the Xth Futurama film". I will be more than happy to support inclusion of the titles in the template (either as red links or unlinked) once the titles are reported in a reliable source. Stardust8212 13:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Comic-Con reveals movie titles.

Comic-Con 2007 is a reliable source, and it's been said that the above indeed are the titles of the 3 other movies. --82.176.160.13 17:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I think the Rich Moore interview here is a better/more reliable source for the film titles. As such I have changed the template and all other instances and moved the article created for Movie #2, if more press comes out indicating the previous title is correct I'd be happy to change it back again. Stardust8212 13:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)