Template talk:IBM

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IBM template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Template update

I made some changes to the template to improve its validity, brevity, and utility, including reorganizing the rows, replacing the individual names of all CEOs with link to List of IBM CEOs, and removing links to several defunct products, since they are still accessible via WP:CAT. If anyone feels any important links were removed, please feel free to restore, but would request they be added into the new rows instead of reverting all together. Thank you. 2600:1700:1BD0:3FF0:7910:2566:F9D0:B397 (talk) 14:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just now reverted. The massive amount of consolidation understates the breadth of the company's reach, makes for a bunch of inaccuracies (half of those "spinoffs" aren't actually spinoffs in the legal sense) and results in unsightly WP:SEAOFBLUE lists. IBM is a Big company; it's fine if it has a Big (but not too Big, which I don't think it currently is) navbox. DigitalIceAge (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]