Jump to content

User:Justinlebar/Sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We want to show .

Assume the opposite: .


Now, either or . In order to arrive at an overall contradiction, we must show that we get a contradiction in either case (is this actually true? I think it is.). Suppose . Then we vacuously satisfy . Now we have to show that it's a contradiction that given no information about or .


Choose f so . Then it must be that ; otherwise, it's not true that . But I see no reason why should have any specific value.


Alternate approach:

Statement 1:

Statement 2:


Proof of :

Consider arbitrary and .

By the properties of , and .

Thus and .

Applying Statement 1, and .

This means that is a lower bound for and .

We defined as the greatest lower bound of and , so .


Proof of :

Let , be such that .

By the definition of the relation, .

By statement 2, .

Substituting, .

By the properties of , and .

Thus .