We want to show
.
Assume the opposite:
.
Now, either or . In order to arrive at an overall contradiction, we must show that we get a contradiction in either case (is this actually true? I think it is.). Suppose . Then we vacuously satisfy . Now we have to show that it's a contradiction that given no information about or .
Choose f so . Then it must be that ; otherwise, it's not true that . But I see no reason why should have any specific value.
Alternate approach:
Statement 1:
Statement 2:
Proof of :
Consider arbitrary and .
By the properties of , and .
Thus and .
Applying Statement 1, and .
This means that is a lower bound for and .
We defined as the greatest lower bound of and , so .
Proof of :
Let , be such that .
By the definition of the relation, .
By statement 2, .
Substituting, .
By the properties of , and .
Thus .