User:Saftgurka/sandbox27
The Psilander affair was an incident that occurred in Skálafjørður near Tórshavn in the Faroe Islands on 20 June 1940 when the four Swedish destroyers HSwMS Psilander, Puke, Romulus and Remus were seized by the Royal Navy. The raid took place out of concern that the Kriegsmarine would otherwise seize the destroyers and put them into German service when they left the North Sea.[1]
The fact that Swedish destroyers were in the Faroe Islands, at a time critical for the United Kingdom in June 1940, was due to the urgent need for military equipment that arose on the Swedish side during the outbreak of World War II in September 1939. Italy was one of the few countries that could sell suitable equipment and a quick purchase of four destroyers was carried out. The ships were tested in La Spezia during March and April 1940. After a long and dramatic journey home, delayed, among other things, by urgent repair needs and the difficulty in obtaining fuel, the destroyers ended up with the accompanying passenger ship Patricia and the tanker Castor in the Faroe Islands, since the fighting in Western Europe forced them to avoid the area around the English Channel.
About a week later, Sweden recovered the seized destroyers after intensive diplomatic activity, and the ships were finally able to sail to Gothenburg. Since the commander of the destroyer force, Commander Torsten Hagman had handed over equipped Swedish naval ships to foreign power without combat, his conduct was questioned and preliminary hearing was held at the military court of the West Coast Naval District. When the case did not go to trial Hagman was also never publicly acquitted in court for his decision.
Background
[edit]When the World War II broke out, there was an urgent need to strengthen the Swedish Armed Forces with new military equipment. In December 1939, the King in Council appointed a commission commissioned to buy in Italy, initially torpedoes and engines for torpedo boats, and if so, ready-made ships were offered primarily destroyers and motor torpedo boats as well as possibly cruisers.[2] The commission consisted of the Naval Engineer of the 1st Rank in the Swedish Navy reserve Holger Graffman, the Swedish Navy lieutenants Johan Gabriel Oxenstierna and Henning Hammargren (who was naval attaché in Rome at the time), and the naval engineer Samzelius.[2]
Purchase
[edit]There was doubt from the Swedish side about the purchase of two destroyers of the Italian Sella-class. These were launched in 1926 and were considered to have passed their age limit before being put into service in Sweden.[3] However, the Italian bid was two Sella and two Spica-3-class destroyers. The latter class was launched in 1934, and significantly more modern.[4] On 21 January 1940, all contracts were ready for the purchase of four destroyers, four motor torpedo boats and more. The four motor torpedo boats of the MAS class, which in Sweden became T11-T14, were transported to Sweden on MS Boreland from La Spezia to Gothenburg in March 1940. Sweden was also allowed to buy other military equipment for a total of SEK 250 million.[5] A total of between 700 and 800 railway wagons qith military equipment rolled from Italy to Sweden with mines, torpedoes, ammunition, spare parts, bombsights and cannons.[5] Later in the spring of 1940, 216 aircrafts were purchased, partly the Fiat CR.42 (J 11) and Reggiane Re.2000 (J 20) fighter aircrafts and the Caproni Ca.313 (B 16) bomb and reconnaissance aircraft.[6] In addition, a large number of aircraft engines and machine gun ammunition were purchased.
The crew's trip to Italy
[edit]Prime Minister Per-Albin Hansson personally supported the appointment of lieutenant commander Torsten Hagman, to Avdelningschef (AC) for the naval force. Hagman had served as Adjutant to Per-Albin Hansson, when he was Minister of Defence in the 1920s.[7] The passenger ship Patricia of Rederi A/B Svenska Lloyd (Swedish Lloyd) was lease and quickly converted into a auxiliary cruisers in the Swedish Navy. The ship was equipped with a 12 cm gun and two 8 mm machine guns. After the return to Sweden, the ship was destined to become the mother ship for the rising number of submarines.[8] The four destroyer crews, a total of 450 men, embarked in Gothenburg and together with Patricia's crew of 36 people began their journey to La Spezia on 4 March 1940.[7] The destroyer crews came largely from the frozen destroyers HSwMS Sigurd and HSwMS Ragnar,[9] as well as HSwMS Vidar and HSwMS Wale.[10] When Gothenburg was blocked by a half meter thick ice, Patricia got icebreaker aid to be able to reach Skagerrak.[8] Without more serious interruptions or incidents, Patricia arrived in La Spezia on 19 March.
Preparation and sea trials
[edit]On 27 March, the Italian flags on the destroyers Bettino Ricasoli, Giovanni Nicotera, Spica and Astore were lowered and Swedish naval ensigns were hoisted on Puke, Psilander, Romulus and Remus, which the destroyers were named.[11] Initially, the latter two were intended to be called Mode and Magne, but the Italian naval command understood that a couple of the ships should be given a name reminiscent of their country of origin.[12] The name change significantly facilitated the continued cooperation. During sea trials, the ships went on "mätt mil" outside La Spezia, and artillery and torpedoes were fired, smoke screens were tested, and more.[13]
Fatal accident
[edit]For the crews there were obvious risks in sea trials and trimming machinery and equipment. A fatal accident occurred when the 1st Radioman, Radio Corporal Erik Larsson, worked with troubleshooting the transmitter in the radio room on Romulus on 4 April together with the 2nd Radioman Tage Sundgren. When Larsson was investigating a contact on the backside of the transmitter, he came in contact with high voltage. Burned on the left hand, Larsson emerged from the back of the transmitter and collapsed in the radio room. Resuscitation attempts were in vain, and Larsson was pronounced dead at a military hospital.[14] A memorial ceremony was held two days later with both Swedish and Italian participation, and his remains was taken onto Patricia for burial in Sweden.
During the work on sea trials and trimming, the crew members gained different insights into Italian culture.
“ | The wardrobe doors had mirrors that covered the entire interior. In them you could reflect both front and back and see themselves in full figure. Of course, for the fashion-conscious Italian officers, it was obvious that men should have tall mirrors. | ” |
— Acting sub lieutenant John Rumenius, 3rd Officer on Remus, [15] |
“ | The Italians are a singing people. The time for departure from La Spezia was approaching and the last flaws on the outside of the ships were being painted over. He was happy and then you sing. Not quiet for himself, but with the full force of his lungs. Rarely have I heard "’O sole mio" sound so beautiful. Imagine a worker on the shipyard in Karlskrona in joy to start and sing. At least I can't. | ” |
— Erik Persson, fireman on Psilander, [16] |
The journey home begins
[edit]Fitting-out and sea trials were completed on 13 April. The Italian Navy ministry had previously granted a shakedown cruise to Tripolis and back, but the German attack on Denmark and Norway on 9 April made this impossible.[17] It was then important that the destroyers left Italy as soon as possible. In the first part of the trip, there were also two Italian naval engineers and seven engine non-commissioned officers on board the destroyers to remedy engine breakdowns.[17]
In Rome, the Swedish naval attaché sought to establish free passage from the English authorities for the naval force through the Strait of Gibraltar, and up to Lisbon. At the same time, the legation in Berlin took care of the creation of free passage from Germany.
The destroyers sailed from La Spezia on 14 April and arrived in Naples the following day, at noon on 15 April. The visit to Naples was made as a reported naval visit, to emphasize that the destroyers had changed to Swedish flag. For the crews, this meant that after completing work on board, they could go ashore during a normal naval visit. On the depot ship Patricia, 30 purchased torpedoes and a large amount of spare parts were loaded for the destroyers and the already delivered torpedo boats.[17] Some ammunition was also loaded on board Patricia. On 18 April, the naval force left Naples with Lisbon as a planned bunkering site. Patricia went first in the column as a cruise control, with 12 knots speed.[18] Then following in the same cruising speed was HSwMS Puke, commanded by Commander Torsten Hagman as force commander. After Puke came HSwMS Psilander commanded by Lieutenant Agne Löfgren, HSwMS Romulus commanded by Lieutenant Rolf Ström, and last HSwMS Remus commanded by Lieutenant Edward Hamilton.[7]
“ | A month's stay in Italy had redeemed us for life. We traveled from a beautiful country with friendly people. | ” |
— Corpral Curt Lennerhed on Romulus, [18] |
On 20 April, the British naval attaché in Rome announced that the "Admiralty would guarantee free passage for the squadron in the same manner as had happened with Boreland and Patricia. Best for you to make your way through the English Channel, whereby the Germans can conveniently assume responsibility in line with Rotterdam."[19] Despite this, the Military Office of the Naval Defence (Sjöförsvarets kommandoexpedition) announced, to the German mission in Stockholm, that the destroyer force planned to travel via Ireland and the Faroe Islands to the Norwegian coast and then to Gothenburg.
Collision
[edit]At noon on the same day, 20 April, Puke suffered mechanical breakdown and left the formation without announcing his intention to the subsequent Psilander,[20] who did not manage to get away but collided at moderate speed Puke's stern with its stem. Puke got a propeller cover torn out, and in the hole after that, water entered. On Psilander, rivets had loosened in the bumped metal sheets of the stem, which also caused a minor leak.[21] When the waterproof bulkheads were intact, both destroyers were able to continue at 12 knots for a while, and the naval force went to Cartagena in Spain for repair, where they arrived on 21 April.
In Spain and Portugal
[edit]In Cartagena, the Spanish workers worked quickly and efficiently on the repairs, despite the destruction of the shipyard after the civil war.[22] Psilander was docked for repair, while Puke was repaired without docking. Due to the unplanned arrival in Cartagena, a great deal of the secrecy surrounding the destroyers and the return home was broken. After stockpiling, the destroyers departed for Lisbon on 26 April, where Patricia had been dispatched in advance to receive ordered oil.[23]
Meanwhile in Cartagena, on 23 April, the Italian naval commander Admiral Cavagnari had informed the Swedish naval attaché by phone that the ships should leave for Sweden as soon as possible. "It should take less than three weeks, but be careful so the German does not damage the ships in the Kiel Canal."[24] This statement was later interpreted as the admiral's understanding of Hitler's plans to attack the West in early May.
“ | I always used to listen to the British radio broadcasts from Malta and Gibraltar. After the passage of Gibraltar, I heard the British broadcaster read the following message: "The destroyers that Italy lent to Sweden today passed Gibraltar. They are now on their way to Lisbon." It might not be so surprising to hear the broadcaster say "lent", but what surprised me was the fresh tone. | ” |
— Acting sub lieutenant John Rumenius, 3rd Officer on Remus, [22] |
The naval force arrived in Lisbon on 28 April and anchored on the river Tagus, where the original plan was to quickly bunker oil and fresh water, and then proceed to Cobh in Ireland. The wait in Lisbon turned out to be month-long as no oil could be accessed, only fresh water. Puke's damage from the collision in the Mediterranean was finally repaired with dock repair.
The destroyers journey was now closely followed in London. In a memo to the Military Office of the Naval Defence (Sjöförsvarets kommandoexpedition), the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs announced::
“ | The Swedish mission in London states that the British Foreign Office has ordered the destroyers to remain in Lisbon for the time being and that under prevailing circumstances they must be strongly discouraged from be transported to Sweden. | ” |
— Telegram from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs to the Military Office of the Naval Defence on 29 April 1940, [22] |
However, this message did not reach Commander Hagman in Lisbon. On 10 May, Germany attacked the Netherlands, Belgium and France on the Western Front, which closed the destroyers route through the English Channel. In the meantime, people were working in Stockholm to get oil to the destroyers from elsewhere and the Chief of the Navy, Vice Admiral Fabian Tamm announced on 15 May that a Swedish tanker was to be expected within four to five days.[25] The Swedish tanker MT Castor had been requisitioned and ordered to join the destroyer force. On 21 May, Castor arrived in Lisbon with 14,495 tonnes of oil, half of which was diesel fuel.[26] In addition, the ship had more than 1,000 tonnes of fresh water in its tanks which was expected to make the destroyers self-sufficient.
A series of telegrams were sent from the Chief of the Navy:
“ | Time number 1400, 24.5.40 Castor with cargo has transferred to the Swedish state. Captain Juhlin has been constituted lieutenant in the reserve. Naval ship. Naval ensign. Included in your force. Departure as soon as possible according to plan to Queenstown. Announce departure time.
Time number 1109, 26.5.40 The The shipping company promised to immediately announce Castor under your command depart with you. The crew's wages are arranged in the same way as Patricia. Your inferred force must be kept together. Castor may not be detached. |
” |
— Telegram from the Chief of the Navy to Commander Hagman in Lisbon., [27] |
The tanker now formally became the naval ship HM Transportfartyg Castor and the commander John Juhlin thus simultaneously became a lieutenant in the Swedish Navy reserve.
On 26 May, the naval force left Lisbon, and on 27 May, it arrived in Vigo, Spain, where Castor and Patricia bunkered fully, and the Italian engine crew on the destroyers went ashore as they were called home by their government.[28] On 10 June, Italy entered the war.
Although the Chief of the Navy had previously given instructions that Castor should accompany the destroyer force, the ship's low speed, about eight knots, meant that oil and water would probably not suffice on the destroyers for the move to Cobh in Ireland, according to Hagman's assessment. He therefore detached Castor and let the destroyers and Patricia to leave Vigo at their most economical speed, twelve knots, in a wide arc out in the Atlantic Ocean towards Cobh on 29 May.
Castor is rammed
[edit]Castor was escorted out through the dangerous submarine area closest to the Spanish coast, and received orders to continue on his own to Cobh.[28] At noon on 30 May, Castor was rammed by a French patrol ship. When, according to documents, the tanker belonged to the Swedish Navy and carried a naval ensign, it still had no guns. A naval ship must have at least one gun, the French commander said.[29] Captain Juhlin was a lieutenant in the Swedish Navy, but did not have a uniform. All this made the French suspicious, and Castor was ordered to go towards Casablanca, where ambiguities would be resolved.[28] After intervention by the Swedish government, the tanker was released after two days, and received orders to reunite with the destroyer force in Cobh.
In late May and early June, the dramatic evacuation of approximately 300,000 English and French soldiers from the beaches of Dunkirk was conducted across the English Channel. A new route out in the Atlantic Ocean towards the Faroe Islands was instructed by the British Admiralty,[30] and Castor would also join there. In practice, the Faroe Islands were occupied by the British military since April 1940, following Denmark's capitulation, but the British did not formally acknowledge this, as it would entail responsibility for the Faroe Islands' board and supply.[31]
Off the south coast of Ireland on 1 June, Patricia discovered a periscope on the starboard, and evasive maneuvers were carried out by all ships.[32] The destroyer force anchored in Cobh (Queenstown) on 2 June. Again, no oil could be obtained ashore. By bunkering from Patricia, the destroyers were able to replenish enough oil to reach the Faroe Islands.[28] In addition, it was announced that 117 civilian passengers, including 40 women and 8 children, would follow Patricia as passengers.[33] Most were former employees of English companies, who have now become unemployed since the companies switched to war production. Among the passengers were several young women who worked as au pairs, or in the service profession, and now wanted to go home because of the war.[30] Also sailors from the wrecked Swedish ships, for example SS Foxen, were among the passengers. These were expected to arrive in mid-June, and the waiting time was utilized by the crews for physical training. On 15 June Patricia took her civilian passengers aboard, and on the night of 16 June they left Cobh for Faroe Islands.
On 14 June, German troops marched into Paris, and on 22 June, France surrendered. This meant that the United Kingdom stood alone against the hitherto ever-victorious German troops, with an imminent threat of German invasion. The Kriegsmarine had previously lost ten of its most modern destroyers in the battles of Narvik on 10 and 13 April 1940, and the British were anxious that Germany would not have quick access to new destroyers.
The incident
[edit]Tuesday, 18 June
[edit]At the British war cabinet meeting in London, the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs announced that four Swedish destroyers had left Éire to go to the Faroe Islands. He suggested the war cabinet to consider the possibility of capture the destroyers upon their arrival in the Faroe Islands. The Foreign Secretary declared himself willing to investigate the matter further.[34]
Wednesday, 19 June
[edit]At the war cabinet meeting, the proposal from the previous day on the capture of the destroyers was discussed. The Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs felt that this was a case where angary could be used. This is a right established by international law for a belligerent nation to seize the property of a neutral state, within the territory of the belligerent nation or territories occupied by it.[34] Prime Minister Churchill considered it of the utmost importance to take possession of the destroyers. Immediate action would be taken and later explanations would be considered appropriate. The war cabinet instructed the Admiralty to order the capture of the destroyers as soon as possible.[34]
In dense fog, Patricia and the destroyers approached the Faroe Islands on a northern course in the early morning, with minimal speed alternating between "Slow" and "Half". At 05.45, "Stop" and "Full reverse" were ordered on Psilander as the rocks were so close that the echo of the steam whistle was thrown back.[35] The ships turned back and waited for the fog to lighten, for the possibility of new berthing. Castor gave its location via radio at 09.00 at about 120 distansminuter from the Faroe Islands, and the ship would be there the following morning.
At the same time, the Swedish consul in the Faroe Islands was not informed in advance of the destroyers' arrival by Swedish authorities, but was told that a large amount was made available to him at Føroya Banki, to be used for the destroyer force's needs. Neither had the British representative, "Naval Officer in Charge of Faroe Islands (NOIC)" Captain Crowther, been informed of the destroyers before he was announced by the Swedish consul.[36]
After the fog lightened in the morning Patricia and the destroyers again steered towards the Faroe Islands, and took aboard pilots that led the ships to the long narrow Skálafjørður near Tórshavn. There Patricia was assigned an anchorage at the far end of the fjord, and the destroyers were allowed to anchor in tactical order - in line,[37] at 2 o'clock in the afternoon. In the same fjord a number of English naval drifters also anchored on each side of the destroyers. Ashore, the British military occupied the small telephone stations along the fjord, and seized binoculars and cameras.[38]
“ | On board Patricia, there was a real hatred of the English now. I wonder what all this means. Many people in London, many from the Ministry of Information, told me before leaving that the English would certainly take the destroyers, otherwise the Germans would. They were still Italian destroyers and not Swedish, they said. | ” |
— Journal entries by Maj Lorents, journalist and translator, member of Tisdagsklubben ("Tuesday Club") and passenger on Patricia., [39] |
Commander Hagman ordered the boilers to be extinguished in order to save oil. This meant that it would take about four hours to get the destroyers ready for departure again.[40] In addition, watchkeeping was ordered on quarters, that is, no combat readiness.[37]
“ | We had oil for about 20 hours left, ie at 12 knots speed. Fresh water was almost gone. There were 320 distansminuter to the nearest Norwegian coast. If Castor did not arrive, our position was not enviable. | ” |
— Rolf Karlsson, crewman on Psilander, [41] |
“ | We could order supplies if we needed, we could recover, take hot baths ashore etc. We took it naturally because we were among friends, we were in agreement. We had been more thoughtful on our journey to the German side, but here we had no idea. | ” |
— Karl Uno Olsson, signalman on Remus, [40] |
The three British Tribal-class destroyers Maori, Tartar and Mashona left the naval base at Scapa Flow on the Orkney Islands at 19.30 with a course towards the Faroe Islands, with the intention of taking over the Swedish destroyers.[42]
Thursday, 20 June
[edit]At 05.00
[edit]In the early morning, Castor arrived in the Faroe Islands and received orders to anchor southeast of Tórshavn about ten distansminuter,[43] one and a half hours walking time, from the destroyers in the Skálafjørður.[40] Later in the morning the British destroyers also arrived.
“ | It was badly done by us and I had a nasty feeling while it was going on. We got ready for battle, put on our lifebelts and steel helmets and steamed into the Skálafjørður where the Swedes anchored far in. | ” |
— Ludovic Kennedy, officer on HMS Tartar, [44] |
The guard on Remus, closest to the fjord estuary, noticed that some large English destroyers anchored and some armed trawlers approached the Swedish force. He awoke the duty officer and reported.[44]
At 07.15
[edit]In a motor boat, the British squadron commander Captain C. Caslon, as well as a Lieutenant Commander (paymaster) as secretary and a civilian arrived to Puke. Caslon orally stated in ultimate form that he had been ordered directly from the British government to seize the destroyers. As a motive for their actions, it was stated that from the English side, it was assumed that the Swedish destroyers would end up in German hands as the ships approached Sweden.[45] According to British requirements, the destroyers would be evacuated within two and a half hours, and the crews would then be transferred to England for further transport to Sweden. Patricia and Castor could continue the journey, but resistance from the destroyers or attempts to sink the ships would be met with "appropriate countermeasures".[46] All radio transmitters on the Swedish ships would be sealed immediately, and attempts to establish a connection with Sweden would be prevented by force.[47]
Commander Hagman's spontaneous response was to reject the demands, and that he would fight alternatively sink the ships.[48] Captain Caslon regretted this and pointed out that it was only a matter of seizing the ships, they would remain Swedish property.
Hagman then demanded the opportunity to get in touch with the Swedish government, but Caslon explained that the use of radio would be prevented by force. Hagman asked to have the British government's demands and motives in writing, after which he would respond in writing. Caslon promised to accommodate this, and then left Puke.[49]
We will have a nice little fight at nine o´clock.
— Commander Hagman's closing comment when Captain Caslon left Puke[48]
At 08.00
[edit]A message was sent from the captain on Puke to other Swedish ships in view: "All captains are called within half an hour".[50] According to the applicable regulations for the Swedish Navy (RM II §56), the commanding officer could, on more important occasions, convene subordinate commanders for council, where minutes are kept but the decision is made by the chief himself.[51]
At 08.06
[edit]Shortly afterwards, a new message came: "Prepare to evacuate the destroyers".[50]
“ | I had written down "Prepare evacuation of the destroyers" but refused to grasp the contents. As training, we used to signal funny texts, which always ended with the word exercise, but this word was missing. In the wardroom I met FC and VO. When I read out the signal message, the commander stared wildly at me. | ” |
— Corpral Curt Lennerhed, skeppsnummer 1 on Romulus, [52] |
Commander Hagman was aware that the destroyer HSwMS Psilander got its name from Admiral Gustav von Psilander, who in the Battle of Orford Ness in 1704 refused to surrender to a powerful English force. While waiting for the other fartygschefer, he formulated his own position.[53]
“ | Here I have an opportunity, which no Swedish officer has had in 200 years, to join Munthe's "Swedish naval heroes". But I have to put my personal ambition in the bag, because the only possibility to solve the task is to now give in and bet that we can get the destroyers back through negotiations. | ” |
— Commander Hagman, referred by sub-lieutenant Bengt Hellsten, 1st Officer on Puke, [53] |
At 09.00
[edit]The British requirements were submitted in writing. The appendix also states "Right of Angary", in which warring countries have the right to temporarily seize the property of neutral power on their own or occupied territory. Prejudice from Franco-Prussian War 1870–1871 and World War I were stated, but none with application to warships. According to the written requirements, any damage to the seized destroyers would be compensated.
“ | Attached to the letter was an appendix which was an excerpt from something that the British called the Right of Angary. Only Churchill could probably explain what this right had to do with an assault on a warship belonging to a neutral country. | ” |
— Acting sub lieutenant John Rumenius, 3rd Officer on Remus, [54] |
After reviewing the written requirements, the fartygscheferna held consultations on board Puke. The balance of power was strong in British favor. The British destroyers were on the move and ready for battle in action stations. Each of the Tribal class destroyers had eight 12 cm guns, four anti-aircraft autocannons and four torpedo tubes. In addition, there were armed English "drifters" between the Swedish destroyers, as well as postings ashore.[51]
On the Swedish side, the ships had a very low level of oil and water and an unfavorable position for battle in the narrow fjord, extinguished and anchored in line. After a few hours of getting the steam pressure up, only Remus' two aft 10 cm guns could be aimed with free firing range at the British destroyers. If the Swedish destroyers had broken out, they would soon run out of fuel and become easy targets for Home Fleet.[51] In addition, Patricia was in the line of fire, loaded with ammunition and with 117 civilians on board.
To self-harm or scuttle their own destroyers would partly help the British in their alleged effort to prevent the destroyers from falling into German hands, and partly jeopardize the Swedish government's compensation claims. In addition, it would have serious consequences for Patricia and Castor with passengers and expensive cargo of munitions and oil.[51]
At 09.20
[edit]Flera av Tribal-klass jagarna styrde in i Skálafjørður, vände och styrde ut igen.[55]
I det pågående fartygschefsmötet, så skulle enligt reglerna den yngste av fartygscheferna, Edward Hamilton på Remus, yttra sig först för att inte påverkas av de äldre. Samtliga fartygschefer hade ändå samma åsikt, att motstånd var utsiktslöst och att situationen borde lösas med förhandlingar mellan respektive länders regeringar.[56] Kommendörkapten Hagman, som befann sig i den för en svensk officer märkliga situationen att ensam behöva fatta beslut som kunde få storpolitiska konsekvenser, skrev i sitt svar till britterna att han under omständigheterna inte hade något annat val än att gå med på kraven. Men han protesterade också i svaret allvarligt mot hela proceduren, särskilt att han förvägrats möjligheten till kommunikation med egna regeringen.[57]
Innan skrivelsen överlämnades hade en förfrågan gjorts, om besättningarna kunde föras över till Patricia och Castor i stället för att, enligt det ursprungliga ultimatumet, föras till England. Begäran godkändes av engelsmännen.[58]
Efter mötet återvände fartygscheferna till sina fartyg och meddelade besättningarna. Endast personliga tillhörigheter skulle få packas ner i sjösäckarna enligt brittiska direktiv. På AC order medtogs dessutom flaggor och befälstecken utom de blåsande, kojer, filtar, gasmasker med mera.[58] En del tillhörigheter kastades överbord, eftersom besättningarna inte ville överlämna det till engelsmännen.[59] Marketenteriinnehållet delades ut så rättvist som brådskan medgav.[60]
“ | Chefen sa åt löjtnant Sölje att dela ut whiskyn bland våra kamrater. Han tog upp alla whiskyflaskorna och delade ut "två per backlag". Efter en stund när chefen frågade efter sina flaskor fick han till svar av löjtnanten "dom har jag delat ut till besättningen". Efter en liten paus medan ansiktet började anta en blåaktig färg kom det: "Vad i h-e menar ni, har ni delat ut spriten till besättningen, det var ju vi som skulle ha den". "Jasså", sa löjtnanten. | ” |
— Einar Andersson, kock på Remus, [61] |
Trots order från AC att inte försämra läget genom sabotage eller motstånd, jagarna var fortfarande svensk egendom, förekom detta på enskilda besättningsmäns initiativ. På Remus, som låg närmast de brittiska jagarna, fick befälet avstyra begäran från besättningsmedlemmar som trots övermakten ville gå i strid.[62][63] I maskinrummet på Remus hade vissa kikar, det vill säga ventiler som växlas mellan öppet och stängt med ett kvartsvarvs vridning, och kranar stängts. Dessutom hade några blindflänsar, det vill säga plattor som stoppar flödet i rörledningen, monterats.[64] Slagstiften till kanonerna hade tagits bort, och gjort artilleriet obrukbart.[64] På Romulus fick radiomännen tillstånd att göra sändaren obrukbar. De slog då sönder slutrör och reservrör, samt lämnade en skylt med texten "Pericolo di Morte" (Varning för döden) i radiohytten.[65]
At 11.00
[edit]Tre drifters användes till att föra över besättningarna från Puke, Psilander och Romulus till Patricia samt från Remus till Castor. Utrymningen leddes av NOIC, Captain Crowther.[58] Utrymningen var känsloladdad för besättningarna från jagarna som fick påspädning av en, i vissa fall, arrogant attityd från drifters besättningar.
“ | Kanoner och kulsprutor var bemannade och riktade mot oss. Den aktra kulsprutan var bemannad av en man i kockmössa, som hotfullt svängde sin kulspruta fram och tillbaka och grinade hånfullt. I det ögonblicket tror jag alla bittert ångrade att vi inte fått möjlighet att sätta oss till motvärn. | ” |
— Acting sub lieutenant John Rumenius, 3rd Officer on Remus, [66] |
“ | Den ena jagarbesättningen efter den andra sattes ombord på Patricia. Vi stod en grupp människor, både passagerare av båda könen och en del av besättningen och bevittnade detta. En dam i gruppen föreslog att vi skulle sjunga "Deutschland, Deutschland über alles", men någon annan säger då "Nej, det är att göra saken värre än den är". Damen replikerade: "Kan den bli det?" | ” |
— Mats Wångbladh, 2:a klass sjöman och sjukvårdare på Psilander och Patricia, [67] |
Efter att svenska besättningarna lämnat kom brittiska besättningar ombord på jagarna, med första åtgärd att hala de svenska flaggorna och befälstecknen.[66]
Friday, 21 June
[edit]Klockan 09.00 kom NOIC, Captain Crowther, till Patricia och meddelade att fartyget kunde avgå. Vid 14-tiden på eftermiddagen lättades ankar och man gick ut genom Skálafjørður med kurs mot norska kusten. Ute på internationellt vatten kunde radiosändare åter användas till kontakt med svenska myndigheter.
I en serie telegram informerade kommendörkapten Hagman, chefen för marinen (CM):
“ | 1510. I ett läge som gjorde motstånd omöjligt, vi därtill utan olja och vatten, engelsmännen igår med 4 Tribaljagare beslagtagit jagarna trots allvarliga protester. Enligt engelsk uppgift svenska regeringen meddelad och åtgärden grundad på internationell rätt.
1515. Besättningarna med personliga tillhörigheter embarkerade Patricia/Castor. Nu till sjöss invid Färöarna kurs 82 fart 8 knop. Anhålles instruktioner. 1520. Enda möjligheten komma i förbindelse att utgå. Om order återvända Torshamn uppger konsuln, förläggning jagarbesättningarna om än med svårighet kan ordnas Torshamn. Engelsmännen mycket ivriga vi skulle gå, vänta tydligen tyskt anfall.[50] Sent på kvällen kom svaret från CM till AC Hagman: 2245. Återgå Torshamn. Återfordra energiskt jagarna. Engelska regeringen ej meddelat något till svenska regeringen.[68] |
” |
Patricia och Castor girade på kontrakurs tillbaka till Färöarna. Under tiden började en diplomatisk telegramväxling mellan Stockholm och London. Kabinettssekreterare Erik Boheman, som var på middag hos den brittiske ministern i Stockholm, Victor Mallet, blev mycket upprörd och krävde att Mallet skulle telegrafera till London om att jagarna omedelbart skulle friges.[69]
Saturday, 22 June
[edit]De två svenska fartygen återvände till Torshamn, där de ankrade på yttre redden klockan 08.00. Den svenske vicekonsuln på Färöarna meddelade att jagarna hade förflyttats till en för honom obekant plats, vilket han protesterat emot hos den brittiske konsuln.[68]
De diplomatiska kontakterna fortsatte. Bland annat samtalade den svenske ministern i London, Björn Prytz, med brittiske utrikesministern Halifax. Prytz meddelade att, om britterna behöll jagarna, skulle tyskarna anklaga den svenska regeringen för att tillåta kränkning av den svenska neutraliteten, och som konsekvens invadera Sverige. Prytz meddelade också att jagarnas färdväg fullständigt hade diskuterats med den brittiska legationen i Stockholm, vilket Halifax inte ansåg sig känna till.[70]
Senare granskning av källmaterial har gett en förklaring till att det brittiska agerandet eventuellt byggde på ett missförstånd. Den svenska formella begäran om fartygspassage hade blivit liggande hos amiralitetet i London på grund av semestertiderna. Därför blev den brittiska regeringen överraskad av den svenska sjöstyrkans förflyttning, som det uppfattades utan förvarning och utan att följa normal rutin och "proper channel". Misstanken väcktes därför att svenskarna var bulvaner i ett försök att förstärka den tyska flottan med italienska fartyg.[71]
The destroyers are recovered
[edit]Under de följande dagarna insåg man på brittisk sida att jagarna var ganska små och inte särskilt effektiva.[72] Man försökte också koppla ett eventuellt frisläppande av jagarna som argument i förhandlingar om andra frågor, till exempel möjlighet att skjuta upp svenska flygplansköp i USA, samt avbrytande av den planerade tyska transiteringstrafiken. Vid brittiska krigskabinettets möte den 24 juni fattades beslut om att släppa jagarna.[73]
På kvällen den 25 juni meddelade NOIC att de svenska jagarna skulle återlämnas till sina besättningar. Två av jagarna befann sig i Kirkwall, och två var på väg dit. För att inte Castor skulle behöva färdas genom de farliga vattnen runt Orkneyöarna fördes Remus besättning också över till Patricia. Enligt direktiv från CM skulle de civila passagerarna inkvarteras i Torshamn, men detta tilläts inte av britterna. Med över 600 personer ombord på ett fartyg som var avsett för 250,[55] avgick Patricia den 30 juni 01.00 till Kirkwall, och var framme cirka klockan 23.[68]
“ | Det fanns också klart antisemitiska inställningar ombord. Jag satt vid ett tillfälle och talade med en person, och då kom ett av Patricias befäl förbi och sa till mig att "här sitter man inte och talar med en tysk jude då jag är i närheten". | ” |
— Maj Lorents, journalist, medlem av Tisdagsklubben och passagerare på Patricia, [74] |
På förmiddagen den 1 juli kunde fartygscheferna och vissa besättningsmän inspektera jagarna. Under färden mellan Färöarna och Kirkwall hade de fått åtskilliga skador. Dels på grund av de engelska besättningarnas ovana vid jagarnas maskineri, dels på grund av svenska sabotage. Detta hade lett till upprepade maskinstopp och bogseringar, allt i mycket hårt väder. På Psilander och Romulus hade britterna torrkokat en panna, som därigenom blivit helt förstörd.[75] På Romulus hade olja dessutom av misstag pumpats upp i gångar och mäss.[76] Puke hade skador efter kollision i samband med bogsering, och hade tappat ett ankare. Den engelska besättningen anspelade också på det kraftigt rullande fartygets namn, som på engelska betyder må illa, kräkas.[77]
Fartygen hade till stor del plundrats på lösa inventarier och verktyg. På Remus lista över förlorade inventarier fanns 22 borddukar, 54 handdukar, 53 tallrikar, 77 kaffekoppar och så vidare i en lång lista. Alla förluster, samt lönekostnader för Patricia och Castors besättningar med mera värderades senare till 879 644 kronor, vilket betalades av britterna.[78]
Jagarna återlämnades 2 juli till sina svenska besättningar, som snabbt utförde rengöring och provisorisk reparation av fartygen. Den 5 juli 02.00 lämnade Patricia och jagarna Kirkwall för att åter färdas mot Färöarna. Castor möttes vid en punkt 40 distansminuter öster om öarna på kvällen den 5 juli,[79] och styrkan gick därefter i kolonn mot Norge, med åtta knops fart och ordningen Puke, Psilander, Castor, Patricia, Romulus och Remus.
“ | När jag tjänstgjort på bryggan 27 timmar i ett sträck sände kapten Juhlin genom mig en semaforbegäran om ytterligare en signalman. Svaret kom omgående: "Tyvärr förfrusen står din grannes åker" efter en känd dikt av Runeberg. | ” |
— Signalkorpral Gunnar Franzén på Romulus, under tillfällig tjänstgöring på Castor, [80] |
Bombanfall
[edit]Efter att ha siktat flygplan både 6 och 7 juli på lång distans kom, utefter norska kusten, vid 6-tiden på morgonen den 8 juli ett bombanfall av flygplan från brittiska kustkomandot, där fyra bomber fälldes mot Castor. Bomberna sprängdes på 50-75 m avstånd från tankern, som efter noggrann kontroll rapporterade att ingen läcka kunde märkas.[81] Anfallet berodde på ett misstag, och britterna har senare bett om ursäkt.[82]
“ | Inte för att man höll på tyskarna, men England miste man all sympati för. | ” |
— Einar Andersson, kock på Remus, [83] |
Efter att både Puke och Remus sänkt drivande hornminor, kom styrkan fram till Kristiansand på morgonen den 9 juli. Då myndigheterna behövde få några timmar för att varsko den egna kustbevakningen om den svenska styrkans förflyttning, blev Hagman under tiden väl emottagen hos de tyska myndigheterna.[84]
“ | Jag fick ett hjärtligt mottagande hos dem som jag helst inte hade velat besöka, medan jag hos dem som jag trodde var våra verkliga vänner togs på sängen med uppfordran till kapitulation. | ” |
— Kommendörkapten Hagman, [84] |
På eftermiddagen fortsatte resan, och på morgonen den 10 juli passerade styrkan in på svenskt territorialvatten. Vid 17-tiden var jagarna förtöjda vid Nya Varvet i Göteborg där de togs emot av chefen för marinen, amiral Fabian Tamm. Han hälsade fartyg och besättningar välkomna hem, men med en kylig underton.[82] Ingen ifrån regeringen fanns representerad i Göteborg, vilket dåvarande statsminister Per-Albin Hansson senare ångrade.[85]
“ | Bilden förmörkades dock när en bister amiral Tamm, chef för Marinen kom ombord. Jag hade tidigare tjänstgjort på amiralens expedition och känt stor uppskattning för honom. Nu kände vi oss inte välkomna och vi kände att resan inte var slut och aldrig skulle bli det. | ” |
— Korpral Curt Lennerhed, skeppsnummer 1 på Romulus, [86] |
Aftermath
[edit]Efter ankomsten till Göteborg hölls på CM:s initiativ förberedande förhör med Hagman vid fältkrigsrätten vid västkustens marindistrikt. På en fråga från förhörsledaren om Hagman ansåg att han uppehållit "svenska flottans anseende och svenska flaggans ära" svarade han, att han ansåg sig i det aktuella läget ha handlat riktigt, oberoende av reglementen och instruktioner.[87]
Sedan fältkrigsrätten återigen sammanträtt den 6 augusti 1940, konstaterades att Hagmans handlande inte skulle leda till ansvar eller ersättningsskyldighet och att ärendet inte skulle gå vidare till rättegång.[82] Vid sammanträdet frågade åklagaren, om det kanske varit lämpligt att låta engelsmännen skjuta ett eller annat skott, och först därefter bestämma om jagarna skulle överlämnas. På det svarade Hagman, att han ofrånkomligt varit tvungen att besvara elden, därmed skulle också alla ersättningsanspråk äventyrats. Det var enligt Hagman utomordentligt viktigt att inte ett enda skott föll.[88]
Trots att statsminister Per Albin Hansson personligen meddelande Hagman att han hade hans stöd för sitt handlande fick Hagman aldrig någon formell upprättelse, eftersom han inte blev offentligt friad i domstol. Han betraktades av många som en förrädare som överlämnat sina fartyg utan strid.[89] Kritiken från högsta marinledningen gällde också att Hagman detacherat Castor utanför Vigo, mot direktiven från CM att låta tankfartyget ingå i jagarstyrkan.[90] Dagen efter det att fältkrigsrätten avslutat sin förberedande utredning, den 22 augusti 1940 utfärdade chefen för kustflottan, konteramiral Gösta Ehrensvärd, en hemlig order:
“ | Jag förbjuder varje officer under mitt befäl att överlämna sina fartyg till främmande makt, vilket skälet än kan vara. Trohet mot fanan är viktigast av allt. | ” |
— Chefen för Kustflottan, konteramiral Gösta Ehrensvärd, [91] |
En pressdebatt bröt ut i samband med krigsrättens dom, där de flesta tidningar stödde Hagmans handlande. En kommentar var att "krigsmannaplikten får inte överflödiggöra bruket av hjärnan".[85] Tidningarna på extrema vänsterkanten, och den för sin tyskvänlighet kända Östgöta Correspondenten var kritiska till Hagmans beslut.[92]
På brittisk sida har flera företrädare efteråt uttryckt att man ångrade åtgärden att beslagta jagarna, som kallats "a dirty trick" igångsatt av Secret Service.[93] En hög civil tjänsteman i Admiralty framförde till dåvarande konteramiral Stig H:son Ericson, att den brittiska åtgärden uteslutande kunde förklaras med det nervösa tillstånd som britterna befann sig i, samt att Admiralty gjort en mycket beklaglig blunder.[93] Churchill erkände också senare för svenske ministern Prytz i London, att Hagman skött "den svåra och pinsamma affären" på ett beundransvärt sätt, och att "han besparade båda länderna mycket besvär".[93] Han nämnde också "Om den svenske chefen varit en brittisk officer i motsvarande läge skulle vi ha givit honom en lämplig utmärkelse för att uttrycka vår beundran och nationens tacksamhet".[94]
Incidenten gjorde att den redan tyskvänliga svenska sjöofficerskåren blev rent fientligt inställd mot Storbritannien i allmänhet och mot brittiska flottan i synnerhet.[1] Detta kom att vålla britterna problem i samband med senare händelser kring de i Sverige instängda norska kvarstadsbåtarna, Operation Rubble[95] och Operation Performance.[96]
I förordet till jubileumsskriften för 50-årsjubileet av Italienexpeditionen år 1990 lovordade dåvarande chefen för Marinen, viceamiral Bengt Schuback, kommendörkapten Hagmans handlande och gav honom en postum upprättelse.[97]
“ | Varje annat alternativ, att sänka fartygen eller att uppta en hopplös och blodig strid, skulle ha spolierat huvuduppgiften, nämligen att föra jagarna till Sverige. Det skulle också ha betytt förlust av svenska liv och kanske till och med ha dragit in Sverige i kriget.
Vårt folk, och speciellt förbandets besättningar, har all anledning att vara tacksamma för kommendörkapten Hagmans kloka beslut i denna svåra situation, som kunde ha slutat mycket illa. |
” |
— Chefen för Marinen, viceamiral Bengt Schuback, Ur förordet till jubileumsskriften "Jagarköp under krig"[98] |
About the sources
[edit]Flera av källorna nämner en fjärde Tribal-klass jagare vid Färöarna, förutom de tre namngivna. Däremot nämner inte någon av källorna vilken jagare det skulle varit. Enligt ett rykte på Romulus fanns också slagskeppet HMS Rodney utanför mynningen av Skálafjørður.[99]
References
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ a b Barker & Kjellström 1976, p. 18
- ^ a b Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 17
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 84
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 18
- ^ a b Fontander 2006, p. 82
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 23
- ^ a b c Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 24
- ^ a b Rumenius 1976, p. 121
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 124
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 263
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 266
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 22
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 123
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, pp. 29–30
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 127
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, pp. 100–101
- ^ a b c Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, pp. 31–32
- ^ a b Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 269
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 35
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 37
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 226
- ^ a b c Rumenius 1976, p. 132
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 38
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 40
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 81
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 134
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 135
- ^ a b c d Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 42
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 137
- ^ a b Fontander 2006, p. 85
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 43
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 143
- ^ Artéus 1996, p. 355
- ^ a b c Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 59
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 145
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 64
- ^ a b Rumenius 1976, p. 143
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 108
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 89
- ^ a b c Fontander 2006, p. 92
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 146
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 159
- ^ a b Fontander 2006, p. 93
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 149
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 147
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 44
- ^ a b Zetterberg & von Hofsten 2020, p. 67
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 45
- ^ a b c Rumenius 1976, p. 153
- ^ a b c d Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 45
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 273
- ^ a b Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 105
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 146
- ^ a b Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 232
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 94
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, pp. 45-47ff
- ^ a b c Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 47
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 157
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 243
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 187
- ^ Rumenius 1976, pp. 157–158
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 96
- ^ a b Rumenius 1976, p. 162
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 288
- ^ a b Rumenius 1976, p. 161
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 209
- ^ a b c Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 48
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 99
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 60
- ^ Artéus 1996, pp. 358–359
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 61
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, pp. 60-63ff
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 98
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 173
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, pp. 246-247ff
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 103
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 197
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 148
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 118
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 50
- ^ a b c Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 82
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 188
- ^ a b Rumenius 1976, p. 181
- ^ a b Fontander 2006, p. 106
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 275
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 56
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 57
- ^ Nilsson 2000
- ^ Rumenius 1976, p. 141
- ^ Fontander 2006, p. 105
- ^ Lundberg 2012, p. 55
- ^ a b c Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, pp. 64-65ff
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 77
- ^ Barker & Kjellström 1976, pp. 75–76
- ^ Barker & Kjellström 1976, p. 144
- ^ Lundberg 2012, p. 57
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 5
- ^ Strömbäck, Jahr & Lilja 1990, p. 255
- Artéus, Gunnar (1996). Svenska officersprofiler under 1900-talet (in Swedish). Stockholm: Militärhögskolan. ISBN 91-87072-19-X. SELIBR 7762137.
- Barker, Ralph; Kjellström, Nils (1976). Blockadbrytarna (in Swedish). Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren. ISBN 9129471672. SELIBR 7233733.
- Fontander, Björn (2006). De onda åren: Sverige 1940-1945 (in Swedish). Stockholm: Carlsson. ISBN 9172037849. SELIBR 10166527.
- Lundberg, Lennart (2012). Svenska öden under andra världskriget (in Swedish). Stockholm: Instant Book. ISBN 9789186939205. SELIBR 12339211.
- Rumenius, John (1976). "Klart skepp för minfällning": en reservfänrik berättar från beredskapsåren i flottan 1939-1940 (in Swedish). Stockholm: Lindfors. SELIBR 7630300.
- Strömbäck, Stig; Jahr, Erik; Lilja, Nils-Hugo, eds. (1990). Jagarköp under krig: dramatisk hemfärd med Italien-jagarna (in Swedish). Stockholm: Jubileumskomm. för 1940-års Italienexpedition. SELIBR 936771.
- Zetterberg, Kent; von Hofsten, Gustaf (2020). Jagarincidenten vid Färöarna 1940: brittiskt försök att beslagta svenska örlogsfartyg (in Swedish). [Stockholm]: Svenskt militärhistoriskt biblioteks förlag. ISBN 9789188885227. SELIBR 7kxw9mkp5fcclqw7.
Web
[edit]- Smith, Gordon (2011). "Naval events, June 1940, Saturday 15th - Friday 21st". www.naval-history.net. Retrieved 2011-01-07.
- Nilsson, Bengt (December 2000). "Sven Hedin och Torsten Hagman : Psilander som förebild under 1900-talet" (in Swedish). Retrieved 2011-01-07.
Further reading
[edit]- Hagman, Torsten (1941). De i Italien inköpta jagarnas utrustning och hemfärd (in Swedish). Karlskrona. SELIBR 2062626.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Hagman, Torsten (1959). Tillägg 1959 till berättelsen "De i Italien inköpta jagarnas utrustning och hemfärd" (in Swedish). Stockholm. SELIBR 3228778.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Hagwell, Åke (1993–2003). Ett jagarköp och ett chefsbeslut 1940 (in Swedish) (New rev. ed.). Torekov. SELIBR 3228783.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Hammargren, Henning (1981). Vapenköp i krig: svenska krigsmaterielinköp i Italien under andra världskriget. Marinlitteraturföreningen, 0348-2405 ; 67 (in Swedish). Stockholm: Marinlitteraturfören. ISBN 9185944025. SELIBR 7753508.
- Hardy, A. C. (1950). Kampen på haven: sjökrigshändelserna under andra världskriget (in Swedish). Malmö: Allhem. SELIBR 1399533.
External links
[edit]- Hagberg, Gunnar: Torsten Hagman är Norrköpings glömda hjälte (article in Norrköpings Tidningar on 12 March 2005) (in Swedish)
- Rosenqvist, Staffan: Beredskapsmärken: Flottan 1939 - 1945 (see especially 1940-års ROMULUSMÄN) (in Swedish)
Category:Sweden in World War II Category:Faroe Islands in World War II Category:Conflicts in 1940 Category:Sweden–United Kingdom relations