User talk:114.72.63.44

This is 114.72.63.44's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Known (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phospheros was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references or content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Known and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Known, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phospheros (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 114.72.63.44! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Phospheros (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Known (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phospheros was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted with no changes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Known and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Known, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phospheros (talk) 06:20, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits

The bulk of your recent edits have been problematic for one reason or another:

Here you submitted a totally insufficient article, Jack Known, which comprises a single sentence with zero references, for AfC review. There's no indication that the subject is notable, which would be the bare minimum threshold for inclusion. You resubmitted the article here, which is just disruptive, since you did nothing to remedy the decline issues as noted by Phospheros.
Here you attribute IMDb as the source of your information, when IMDb is not a valid source. See WP:RS/IMDB and WP:RS. IMDb is user-generated. We don't use sources that are user-generated as references, that includes Wikipedia itself.
Here you submitted another article for AfC review. That article only uses Wikipedia as references, which as noted above, is insufficient.
Here you make a mistake, which you fixed moments later.
Here you make a mistake, which you fixed two days later.
Here you remove column formatting, which you undo eight minutes later.
Here you add a wikilink for English, even though everybody reading the English Wikipedia is going to know what English is. See WP:OVERLINK.
Here you erroneously "fixed" a wikilink, changing it from [[India]]n to [[Indian]]. Since the correct primary topic for nationality is the subject's nation, that would be "India", not "Indian". Secondly, Indian is a disambiguation page, which you clearly did not bother to check. We don't generate wikilinks to disambiguation pages. Further, if you read WP:LINKING under "Plurals and other derived names" you will see that the India link was correctly formatted per our style guidelines.

So far I'm struggling to see how your contributions are helpful in any way, and I'm getting the sense, based on some of your edit summaries, that you're not here to be constructive. If you submit any more poorly thought-out edits, I'll have to interrupt your editing privileges. Maybe you should steer clear of Draft articles and just fix basic stuff like typos until you get the hang of editing. Or, if English is not your primary language, edit at a Wikipedia in your native tongue. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.