User talk:12.203.10.240

where does harry potter go to buy his school supplies?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.55.212.117 (talk • contribs) .

Diagon Alley. Unfortunately for you, they don't have grammar classes there. Why are you asking someone who's been absent from Wikipedia for over three years anyway? 67.171.170.241 13:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Harry Potter newspapers and magazines

An article that you have been involved in editing, Harry Potter newspapers and magazines, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter newspapers and magazines (2nd nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Confederacy of Independent Systems

I have nominated Confederacy of Independent Systems, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confederacy of Independent Systems. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. User:Dorftrottel 05:22, January 22, 2008 05:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Galactic Civil War

I have nominated Galactic Civil War, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galactic Civil War. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Magic in Harry Potter

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Magic in Harry Potter. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic in Harry Potter. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of JumpStart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JumpStart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JumpStart(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Forbidden Forest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Forbidden Forest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Forbidden Forest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 14:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2098

The article 2098 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTALBALL - doesn't meet WP:GNG or any other aspect of WP:NOTABILITY. We don't even know if there will be a year named that, or if this planet will definitely still be around.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2098 for deletion

This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article 2098 is being considered for deletion. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2098 until a consensus is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the policies and guidelines which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion.

Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article— doing so may be considered an act of bad faith and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you! GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 16:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Magic in Harry Potter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic in Harry Potter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic in Harry Potter (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. El cid, el campeador (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Galactic Civil War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galactic Civil War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galactic Civil War (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry Potter's" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter's and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Harry Potter's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.