User talk:122.53.222.246

March 2020

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you recently removed content from It's Showtime (TV program) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dewritech (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Serendi ^podous 16:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as done at Timeline of the 21st century.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

From surveying your recent contributions, it seems that you have been adding a great degree of detail that other editors have found to be inappropriate. If you find that other editors are disagreeing with changes that you have made, the proper next step is to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. Simply ignoring other editors is not an option, and may lead to further blocks. If you need further help understanding Wikipedia's editing norms after your block expires, consider asking a question at the teahouse, our noticeboard for helping new editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at History of the Philippines (1946–1965), you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at News TV Quick Response Team. NonsensicalSystem^(err0r?)_(.log) 13:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at History of the Philippines (1986–present), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Serendi ^podous 12:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP editor. It seems likely you will be blocked if you don't respond. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Continued addition of irrelevant material by User:122.53.222.246 despite one-week block. EdJohnston (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: I just noticed this warning. This IP is still continuing, and this just looks like a continuation from 58.71.120.251 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (and probably Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Yaysmay15). — MarkH₂₁^talk 04:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't win this

Wikipedia doesn't work that way. Simply adding material over and over again will not make it stay there. The only way to get your material to stick is to convince other editors on the talk page that it deserves to be there. Serendi ^podous 13:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your edit to 2020 in the Philippines has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Your edit was an exact copy, even including the grammatical error, of the original RolandR (talk) 16:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Timeline of the 21st century shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MarkH₂₁^talk 04:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Note that I'm willing to undo the block if you respond here that you're willing to communicate with other editors properly. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the articles he chooses to edit, this is most likely Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Yaysmay15. Notice that 2020 in the Philippines is his type of article. There is also an SPI report with the same name. This problem has been going on since 2016. EdJohnston (talk) 01:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.