Jump to content

User talk:188.96.229.167

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2016

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 22:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierre Valkering (April 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 188.96.229.167! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory Greiten (April 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is three times you've resubmitted without a single improvement. This is considered WP:GAMING the system and isn't tolerated.
Sulfurboy (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernd Mönkebüscher (April 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierre Valkering (May 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by RoySmith was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has been resubmitted twice, both times with no changes made since the prior decline.
-- RoySmith (talk) 19:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]