User talk:202.40.137.196
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
 | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
TarnishedPathtalk 12:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Why?
[edit]Special:Contributions/202.40.137.196
11:56, 10 September 2024diff hist +221 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Tgeorgescu racist remarks: Reply Tag: Reply11:54, 10 September 2024diff hist +226 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Tgeorgescu racist remarks: Reply Tag: Reply- 11:25, 10 September 2024 diff hist +2 Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine →This page is scientifically inaccurate and negatively biased Tag: Reverted
- 11:24, 10 September 2024 diff hist +1,701 Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine →This page is scientifically inaccurate and negatively biased: Please stop suppressing freedom of speech. Wikipedia is not owned by editors like you. Tags: Reverted Disambiguation links added Reply
10:38, 10 September 2024diff hist +831 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Proposal: Topic ban: Reply Tag: Reply
YOU CAN'T HIDE IT. SEE:
THIS IS WHAT THEY SAID. WIKIPEDIA IS HELPING THEM TO CAST ASPERSIONS TO CHINESE SCIENTISTS AND THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT：
"Chinese medical scientists lack funds for performing research, lack freedom of speech, lack a culture of contradicting their peers if objective evidence so demands—they're basically educated that speaking truth to power is insanity. They know that criticizing TCM could make some CCP boss angry, and that would mean jail time. Totalitarianism is a ruthless game, and science is its victim. The PRC government is not interested whether TCM is effective, they just see it as a cash cow. Research about its effectiveness could only ruin the cash flow."
The Chinese government should sue them for that and for muting people like me who dare to speak up unless they change their polices and apologize. 202.40.137.198 (talk) 08:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- They are aspersions because
Country (and the EU) GERD as % of the GDP in 2017[1] GDP Growth (annual %) in 2017[2] Main GERD source of fund[1] Targets USA 2,81 2,33 Business European Union 2,15 2,8 Business 3% of EU GDP by 2030 China 2,11 6,95 Business annual increase of 7% (2021- 2025)[3]
Country (and the EU) GERD as % of the GDP in 2017[1] GDP Growth (annual %) in 2017[4] Main GERD source of fund[1] Targets Uruguay 0,48 1,63 Higher Education Mali 0,29 5,31 Rest of the World Armenia 0,22 7,5 Government Iraq 0,04 -1,82 Government Guatemala 0,02 4,63 Higher education
- 202.40.137.198 (talk) 09:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- GERD stands for Gross domestic expenditure on R&D 202.40.137.198 (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference
:2was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "GDP Growth (annual %)". World Bank. 2017. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ The People's Government of Fujian Province (9 August 2021). "Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) for National Economic and Social Development and Vision 2035 of the People's Republic of China". Retrieved 13 April 2022.
- ^ "GDP Growth (annual %)". World Bank. 2017. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |