User talk:70.18.228.22

Welcome!

Hi 70.18.228.22! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2021 Atlanta spa shootings, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at 2021 Atlanta spa shootings, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. SHB2000 (talk) 07:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SHB2000: Hi. I don't know who you are, but the sentences I removed are NOT "encyclopedic" content. They are radical, opinionated statements, which have no place in an encyclopedic article of this nature. If the goal is to document these perspectives, that should be done in a separate article where contrasting perspectives can be presented and discussed. Instead, they are presented here with no alternative interpretations of the subject matter, suggesting they are undisputed matters of fact, which they are not. Take for example the claim that "Asian women are fetishized in American society". Not only is this statement overbroad (what qualifies as "American Society"?), but it appears to be a complete non-sequitur with the first part of the clause (race being a motive). It is not at all clear, nor is it explained or defended, how an act of violence follows from or is at all causally related to Asian women being "fetishized". In fact, the claim is not defended at all, and there is no apparent connection between it and the subject at hand. Such biased, shameless opining is abhorrent for a publication claiming to be an encyclopedia.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.