User talk:Adam Bishop

• Archive: June 10-December 30, 2003
• Archive 2: December 30, 2003-July 15, 2004
• Archive 3: July 17-December 30, 2004
• Archive 4: January 1-July 13, 2005
• Archive 5: July 17-December 31, 2005
• Archive 6: January 3-July 19, 2006
• Archive 7: July 21, 2006-July 12, 2007
• Archive 8: July 17, 2007-July 2, 2008
• Archive 9: July 5, 2008-July 12, 2009
• Archive 10: July 17, 2008-June 30, 2011
• Archive 11: July 20, 2011-December 29, 2015

Help for blocking lt.wikipedia.org

Good evening, Mr. Adam Bishop, I wanted to ask you to help me in trouble Lithuanian Wikipedia. Behold, I got a little sick Tourette's syndrome, and sometimes I get angry and not in control of the words, and it happened there. I wrote a considerable criticism, and I told them back, "Bounce," and I was banned for 1 day. But then I was very curious, and I asked for all the details on Wikipedia, etc. And took me away, and to extend the blocking 8 months in. Then I began creating clones. But I continue to "excellent" edited by Wikipedia, in the articles, but then again I saw blocking the message, and angry. And I created the clone, created before 11, but anyway I edited, created 2 articles. (Because then I paid them not to develop). And then extend the blocking period of 3 years. And I very much want there the Wikipedia edited, so in every possible way I wanted to unlock. And I wrote in the e-mail, and everywhere, and tried to IRC, but not switched on, so in one word remained this situation. Then I created the English Wikipedia, and everything went well for me, I was invited to the "Teahouse" be paradise! And here all the other people do not like the Lithuanians, they are stubborn and wrong. And here I created, I do not remember any of their regions, many villages, perhaps 5 villages, 2 rivers, 1 lake. Maybe you can help in any way? Plus I created yesterday again Lithuanian Wikipedia account, I wrote what I do is, I opened my heart, and today still went and blocked User: Homo ergaster. And I do not know what to do. And I want and there and then edit the articles, maybe here I will become administrator ever. So HERE is hopeful. Thank you. P.S if you look at those who blocked me: Homo ergaster, and my account Lukas_GamingLT --L.ukas lt 13 --Talk 15:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raoul of Merencourt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blanche of Navarre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Catholic-Hierarchy.org

Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website Catholic-Hierarchy.org is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard [1]. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Counterstrike (drum and bass group)

Hi, just letting you know that the above article has been prodded, as the prodder didn't bother.146.90.6.53 (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Florentine listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Florentine. Since you had some involvement with the Florentine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Hi Adam! I'm a new user and I would give a special thing for you! Here's a cookie. Aldrianyf (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Re "The Assassins"

Sir, I see that you are an authority. Thank you for your kind, well informed rejection of my proposal. Would you, if not inconvenient please supply me with a source for your correction of my error. Preferably an original text and not a later commentary. Thanks again and never mind Heidi! This is a worthy institution in an unworthy general populace.SBader (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Metal (music)

Hello Adam Bishop,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Metal (music) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 03:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Request your views on an article nominated for deletion

I'd request you to state your vote on [[2]] article for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.177.216.113 (talk) 11:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Roman And Byzantine Military History

Hello I currently have a project known as the Roman and Byzantine military history page Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Roman and Byzantine Military History, I was wondering if you would like to join, as you have shown interest in the byzantine empire. Iazyges (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Jonathan Riley-Smith

http://www.hist.cam.ac.uk/news/029-professor-jonathan-riley-smith-1938-2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siriaeve (talk • contribs) 20:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Adam Bishop (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Adam Bishop. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Adam Bishop.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

bacon/napkin

Hello Mr. Bishop! Do you pronounce the word bacon as [ˈbeɪkən], but the word napkin as [ˈnæpkɪn]? 206.180.244.235 (talk) 03:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy Saturnalia!

		Happy Saturnalia
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Trollee

Re special:diff/574897779 I found a reference listing Nissae Isen (just made a page!) as a principal cast member and she also got an award nomination for MtK so I think you're probably right.

If we can't find any online sources confirming this then I think we could cite an episode directly, in which case I'd need to figure out the first episode Trolee appeared in. Although I'm limiting to checking whatever's either Treehouse On Demand or else checking upcoming showtimes.

There isn't a cast section for MtK and since there's a Canada/UK version, putting together a table would probably help let us know where we're missing actors. Ranze (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

On this day, 15 years ago...

Hey, Adam Bishop. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 02:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

House of Ibelin

Hello Adam
Thanks for your edit here the other day; I think the original hatnote was actually referring to a similar-sounding place in the Galilee, rather than the town now at the site where Ibelin was. It's pretty academic now, though, and it isn't necessary on a genealogy page (I've added the previous link to the dab page already) so I've removed it altogether.
I gather from your comments you added the family tree; is it worth putting lines in (like here)? I don't know if that'd make it easier or harder to read. What do you think? Moonraker12 (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your note: I'm not sure what's best to do, so I have left some suggestions on the talk page there. if there are no objections I'll have a go at it in a while. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 23:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Translation

Greetings. Could you give me a quick translation about this French interview? No need for an identical translation but just a small overview. Anyways, regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

About vandalism on the article of Presidential Elections in Iran 2017

Good evening Sir, I allow myself to report a persistent vandalism actions about a non user called Pahlevun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on the article about Iranian Presidential elections that censures informations about declared candidates without real reasons and even the information is verifiable and official.

This person has been warned and each time allows itself to delete only one declared candidate "Dr Hossein Homayoun Fard" who's official candidate at this election and who officially is registered under official institutions of Iran. So he has the right to be included as the other candidates on this article and "Pahlevun" erases his name when the article is updated.

Can it be possible to block his capacity of intervention on this article which is an information one and not a political tribune ?

I'm new on Wikipedia and I have many things to learn. And forgive my errors in english and also my errors in the form of writing also. (I'm not even english speaker at the base). Thanks as advance. Best regards. --TheSimorgh (talk) 12:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@TheSimorgh: You have not provided a single reliable source that says he has done so. Verifiability is the Wikipedia policy you are ignoring and I will revert you every time you add it with no proper source. Stop labling me and edit warring. Pahlevun (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Pahlevun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) you're censuring public information about an election. Are you working for any public administration in relation with the elections to decide who must be in the list of candidates or not ? Are you up the Iranian Government who received Dr Homayoun Fard candidature by the way of Iranian Embassy in France in all respectful and legal forms ? You don't have any wright to censure information. Your interventions are censure and vandalism not more not less. I'll make changes each time you'll change it too. And contrary to what you're talking information is verifiable by the links I've put. First, the public anounce by the website of Ayyaran Group. Second, I give the link of Iranian Embassy in France that can confirm that Dr Hossein Homayoun Fard is officially candidate. So if you're more important source than Iranian Government I'm very curious. You're actions are violating ethics of Wikipedia. My informations are linked with official sources. If it disturbs you that shows that you're doing politic filtering and it's vandalism. I won't stop warning you and won't stop modify the article each time you'll modify it. I have time and you'll be tired before me count on it. I'm for freedom of expression and freedom of information what you're not and sensibly !. --TheSimorgh (talk) 13:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikimania 2017 in Montréal

Wikimania 2017

This year, Wikimania is happening in Montréal, from August 11 to 13, and for the Hackathon and the Sourcethon, from August 9 to 10!

I see that you are involved with the Canada chapter of Wikimedia. Do you want to participate in the Wikimania in the front row?

You want to give us a hand? We need YOU as a volunteer!

Contact Antoine2711 at abeaubien@wikimedia.ca.

Come make a difference with a great team of passionate Wiki people.

--Antoine2711 (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Pastoralis praeminentiæ listed at Redirects for discussion

I have nominated the redirect Pastoralis praeminentiæ for deletion. Since you created that redirect in 2007, you may want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sideways713 (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Latin help

Adam, if you have a moment could you check my translation/interpretation of the following passage? It is from document no. 50 in this collection.

Hoc autem donum facimus ob remissionem peccatorum nostrorum, videlicet mei Petri Assur et coniugis mee Elo, seu pro anima comitis Ermengaudi, qui in castro Gerb mortuus est, et pro anima filii sui, qui sepultus est Celsone, et uxoris sue Marie, et istius pueri Ermengaudi minoris, quatenus Orbis Factor tribuat ei victoriam super paganos.

which I translate as

This gift we make for the remission of our sins, namely Pedro Ansúrez and my wife Elo, and for the soul of Count Ermengol, who died in the castle of Gerb, and for the soul of his son, who is buried in Solsona, and his wife María, and this boy Ermengol the younger, that the Maker of the World give him victory over the pagans.

The main reason I am asking is that I want to be sure that there are three generations here: Ermengol who died in Gerb, his unnamed son, his unnamed sons's wife María and Ermengol the younger (who would be unnamed and María's son). It seems odd that they would not name the intervening son (who would be Ermengol V of Urgell, husband of María, Pedro's daughter). Is it saying that Count Ermengol had a son buried in Solsona and a daughter-in-law named María? Thanks, Srnec (talk) 23:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Srnec, yes, that's correct - just some grammatical points, "quatenus" is a medieval way of saying "ut", so they're making the gift "so that the Maker of the World may grant" etc. "Istius pueri" must mean "their son", with the relationship that you mentioned (i.e. Ermengol the younger is the son of Maria and the unnamed son of Ermengol the elder). "Iste" is a weird word to use there though.It could also mean that Ermengol the younger is Maria's son from another man, or more likely since they share a name, Ermengol the elder's son's son with another woman...but I might be reading too much into it! It is as you say, three generations. Adam Bishop (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I was wondering what work "istius" was doing. I found it odd that the charter avoids naming Ermengol V, although it twice mentions Ermengol IV and his death at Gerb and has no problem naming María or Ermengol VI. Maybe Pedro did not like his son-in-law. Srnec (talk) 23:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Viacom listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Viacom. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Viacom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Silicon Graphics listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Silicon Graphics. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Silicon Graphics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Novell listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Novell. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Novell redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Borland International listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Borland International. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Borland International redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Apple Computer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Apple Computer. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Apple Computer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hello Adam. Many thanks for your scholarly and comprehensive reply to my question at the Reference Desk regarding multiple versions of the Latin word for square. Your help is much appreciated. Dolphin (t) 21:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome! Adam Bishop (talk) 23:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Article request

Would you be willing to create an article on Kitty, a Fair But Frozen Maid? There appears to be decent sourcing at fr:Kitty, a Fair But Frozen Maid, so I suppose you could just translate the content. Nyttend backup (talk) 16:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

It looks like it would be simple enough to translate. I will try to do so if I can find the time! Adam Bishop (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Nationalistic edits?

May you evalute the behaviour of this user[3]? He seems biased by nationalistc POVs. He has previous warnings? May show me the proper place for this kind of problems, in eng-wikipedia? Thank you. --Rosso Veneziano (talk) 08:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

<blush>

...Adam B., did you actually peek at my browser history, or am I that obvious? You totally nailed my work process on that French:English query on the RD/L. Your reply gets top marks for style and content, and you're evidently too much of a gentleman to have clicked on the Wikidata links I provided and scoop me on the en & fr corrections of label/description/alias. I've hastened to do so myself - Wikidata is hugely forgiving in providing laconic edit summaries, so it's all good. </blush> Are you supporting the continuance of the RDs? I've always figured I'm - intermittently, at least - on the sunny side of the signal:noise ratio, in that with most of my queries I'm honestly trying to improve an article or item, and I'd like to think it matters to a wider readership out there. I'm curious to read the discussion but admit I'm apprehensive. No matter what, it's always reassuring to read your contributions and know there are those who make Wikipedia (and so, the world) a better place. -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 11:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't realize it was you who translated it :) Working as a translator and proofreader makes it easier to recognize patterns of thinking in other people when they are translating. I didn't have a chance to check the edit summaries on Wikidata, but WordReference is one of my primary dictionaries in my job, so I know its quirks!

I'm very much pro-RD. I know we have collaborated on improving, and even creating, articles based on Reference Desk questions on several occasions in the past, so the Desks are clearly useful. I wouldn't bother reading the discussions, since nothing will come of them. My suggestion is to ban certain users from the Reference Desks, which in my opinion would solve all of the problems, but I know that won't happen either. Adam Bishop (talk) 12:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Saturnalia!

		Happy Saturnalia
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free and you not often get distracted by dice-playing. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Adam Bishop. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Please refrain from gang formation and edit-terrorism on Internet

You're involved in edit-terrorism on the article Seventh Crusade. Please spare Wikipedia of Fundamentalist and extremist propaganda. Please refrain from edit terrorism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:2395:27F6:0:0:25E1:88AC (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Refrain from Christian fundamentalism and extremism and spreading edit terrorism.

The correct explanation of Christian religious Fundamentalist wars imposed on Muslims have been given for sake of better understanding and awareness. Please do not engage in edit terrorism. Please do not spread edit terrorism on Internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:239A:C03A:0:0:2057:70AC (talk) 10:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Treaty of Utrech

I added information about the Treaty of Utrech https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tratado_de_Utrecht The Party on "the case of the Catalans" on the page on the treaty in English. you delete my contribution That has many historical proofs and is true. Why did he do it? Does he not want the truth to be known? Do not you want the whole world to know that Catalonia is part of Spain because it lost a war because the united kingdom abandoned it?

Regards. Sylas (talk) 06:49, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_bwuctROKiuEO1AV&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

A little help with Latin

Hi @Adam Bishop:,, I have created a personal user award for contributions related to ancient Roman history. I have dubbed it "the Barnstar of Tacitus". Could you review my translation: "stella horreorum Taciti" Thanks. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @InformationvsInjustice:, I guess that would be the very literal translation! I notice that other Wikipedias don't necessary call these "barnstars" but have another word referring to another kind of reward. I bet the Taberna on the Latin Wikipedia could come up with something more appropriate. You can ask questions in English there. Adam Bishop (talk) 15:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Ancient Greece

Given your experience with the classics, would you mind participating at a CFD? I've noticed that many of our categories use "Ancient Greece" non-initially, and many others use "ancient Greece", so Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 July 5#Ancient Greece is an attempt to gain consensus for one or the other. So far I've gotten only two other participants, so it would help if you could offer an opinion. Nyttend (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Another Latin question

Salve amice,

Aiutum! I am struggling with the difference between evocare and devocare, evoco and devoco. I understand evoco to mean to summon, or lure. An evocatio was a ritual designed to "distract" a city's gods by a besieging army. But I find in Pliny's Natural Histories XXVIII ch.4, devocare is used for summoning Jupiter. Are the two interchangeable?

Evocatus is a veteran heeding the call to return to duty. So what would a devocatus be?

If you can help, awesome, don't feel obliged to respond if you can't :-) Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 04:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

They do seem to have similar meanings that could be interchangeable. They are both something like "call forth" or "call out", so it would be easy for the meanings to converge. "Devocatus" is a possible word but it doesn't seem to be a regular noun, just the past participle of devocare. The same thing happens with other words that can take de- or ex- as a prefix, like "deferro" and "effero", both mean bring/take/take away/take out etc. It does't always work though, sometimes they are the opposite! Like deficio and efficio. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

CFD notice

Hello, because you participated in one or both of the CFD nominations for "Ancient Greece" in July, I wanted you to know that I've created a second nomination for Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 1#Ancient, and thank you for contributing to the discussion. Nyttend (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.

House of Ibelin, again

Hello Adam
I finally got round to doing something about this; I thought I'd better let you know. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your note; looking at it again, I think the Lusignans were the main problem (being so many of them, but not male-line descendants). I'm wondering, though, whether it's worth copying the Lusignans there to the HoL page as well. What do you think? Moonraker12 (talk) 22:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to provide consultancy

Hi Adam Bishop,

I'm inviting admins to join our team at parli.co providing advice on how to build and manage a collaborative website. Parli.co is an emerging project aiming at building a sort of Wikipedia of arguments around controversial topics (more info here). Part of our budget will be destined to such consultancy work, and we think we could benefit from the experience of Wikipedia janitors and admins. Feel free to message me back with interest and questions. --isacdaavid 22:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Hello there im new here and i wanted to say hi!! I would like some advice if possible please. Vivian the creppypasta (talk) 01:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

For the sheer laugh out loud experience of your user page. Droll, very droll. Thank you. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Robert of Nantes

On 28 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert of Nantes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert of Nantes was "an old and venerable man aged eighty years" when he was imprisoned along with Louis IX of France during the Seventh Crusade? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert of Nantes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert of Nantes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of National Hockey League arenas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

List Of Programs Broadcast By Treehouse TV

Hi,

I noticed your post in the Talk section of List of programs broadcast by Treehouse TV. I have removed several fake ones (an IP Address keeps putting them back plus someone has been adding shows that don't have an article and when you search them on Google it will link to someone's YouTube account with shows not appropriate for preschoolers. I will try to keep an eye on the article; this is one of the few articles I will try to keep up to date.

I just decided to let you know that someone is going to try to keep an eye on the article; I also requested for page protection. TheBlackKitty (talk) 00:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! That's excellent work. I've been trying to keep an eye on it over the years, but now that my own children are too old for Treehouse, I have no idea what is real or not these days. Adam Bishop (talk) 01:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome! I'll just check the official website to see what is still airing. TheBlackKitty (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Going "oh...!"

Who would go "oh...!" and smile politely if he or she gets a chance to learn something about the legal system in the early Crusader kingdoms? I'm flabbergasted! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Oh, mostly family, non-academic friends...even academic friends sometimes...but you're right, it makes no sense! Who wouldn't want to learn about that? Adam Bishop (talk) 20:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

I've had similar experiences when talking about the difference between undecidable and semi-decidable, or between primitive recursion and μ-recursion. Apparently, most people are weird. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 23:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Could you please guide me with some help

Hi ::@Adam Bishop: I am sorry for disturbing you. I was hoping If you could help me out with wikiedu.org. I am new to wikiedu.org Will that be possible. If not can you recommend an Instructor who could help me. (Purplecart (talk) 10:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC))

A kitten for you!

FOR BEING AROUND SO LONG :D

Am149072 (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are welcome :D

Am149072 (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy Saturnalia

		Happy Saturnalia
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Felicem Saturnaliam! Adam Bishop (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Vicipaedia

Hi, Adam. Happy January. We need you at Vicipaedia ... always, of course, but especially just right now if you are able to make la:Usor:UV our interface administrator. See the latest discussion (a good consensus) at the la:Vicipaedia:Taberna. Thank you! Andrew Dalby 08:28, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

I have a question as you are a professional historian, a lot of drama being going on at the balkans. What is your opinion about the macedonian name dispute and what do you think about the ancient Macedonian civilization, is Macedonia the descedants, is Greece? Or none of them. (If you have some knowledge of the dispute) Δημήτρηss (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Draughtsman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Draughtsman. Since you had some involvement with the Draughtsman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpinningSpark 09:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

New mailing list for Wikimedia Canada

Good day all, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [4]. To send messages to the list, write to general{{at}}discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Please listen to this song I wrote.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2vFnyiq2RY — Preceding unsigned comment added by YeahItsJosh (talk • contribs) 16:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Adam Bishop,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 18:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

S.O.S

Good morning.

I contact you because I was banned from modifications on the French Wikipedia ! You'd like to know why ? Because I deleted the discussions on my own page and I put in the Infobox the flags of countries and cities, states, counties ... Some French administrators decided that it was forbidden or not recommended... Then Gemini1980 banned me... I find it unacceptable, this person uses his "power" and his fellow administrators too. I can not do anything against this. What should I do ? What can you do ?

Sincerely TH2M8S aka THOMAS TH2M8S (talk) 16:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello Thomas, unfortunately there is nothing I can do. I'm not an administrator on the French Wikipedia, which has its own rules. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Connection to Gerberga of Saxony/ Reversal of my edits on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree article

Hello,

I just want to let you know I strongly disagree with your reversal of my edits on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree article and have therefore reverted it again. You can find my arguments on the talk page of the article, if you still disagree with my edits please let know (by presenting your arguments to why you think so). Thank you for your attention.

With kind regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 03:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I replied to your message on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree talk page, I would be grateful if you would be so kind as to read the arguments I have written and reply to them individually and explain to me exactly why you are opposing my edit.

Best regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 12:33, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

P.S.: I explained why I think it is a different situation when it comes to Baldwin II's article. I am not trying to engage in any disruptive behaviors, I simply want to have a debate over this. If you could explain to me how you oppose my edit (by addressing my arguments individually) I would be satisfied. Thank you very much for your attention,

Best regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 13:19, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, thank you so much for taking the time to reply to my messages on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree talk page, that is virtually all that I wanted. I replied to your remarks on the aforementioned talk page, I would be grateful if you could please take a look on it. Thank you again for your attention and consideration.

With kind regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 16:44, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Armstrong, Louis Satchmo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Armstrong, Louis Satchmo. Since you had some involvement with the Armstrong, Louis Satchmo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

"Echo Sounding" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Echo Sounding. Since you had some involvement with the Echo Sounding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Dawnseeker2000 17:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

"Political Scientist" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Political Scientist. Since you had some involvement with the Political Scientist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. From UnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 04:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Io Saturnalia!

		Io, Saturnalia!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

We need you at Vicipaedia

Hi Adam. Happy 2020. We have elected three new magistratus, la:Usor:Giorno2, la:Usor:Sigur, la:Usor:Andreas Raether. You can see the election results at la:Vicipaedia:Petitio magistratus. I hope you can give admin rights to these three for us -- thank you! I should add that Andreas Raether hasn't yet responded where it says "Responsum usoris Andreae Raether:". I have reminded him, no doubt he will do it any moment, and if you wait until he actually has done it you will be in fullest accord with the rules. Andrew Dalby 19:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

He's written a word or two. All three elections are complete now, nemine still contradicente. Andrew Dalby 10:17, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Factum est! I hope I did everything correctly (it's a pretty simple procedure, but I always have to re-learn how to do it each time!). Adam Bishop (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

De grapheocratis in Vicipaedia Latina

Salve, Adam! Grapheocratam secundum in Vicipaedia Latina elegimus (videas hanc paginam et tabernam). Nemo nisi tu nos iuvare potest! Demetrius Talpa (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind that they elected a second grapheocrates. Doesn't mean you're not needed, as demonstrated by the fact that I'm currently under several doctors, hence sometimes absent from Vicipaedia. I intend to emerge, however. Andrew Dalby 09:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

No, I don't mind at all - I'm not very active on Wikipedia lately, in any language, so it's better if there's two of us! Adam Bishop (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Another thing

Hi Adam,

I noticed that you were one of the earliest to edit Jawaharlal Nehru's Wikipedia page. Since you are one of the earliest editors at Wikipedia, I wanted to get your opinion about the notability of Sharjeel Imam whose Wikipedia page I created recently but then that got deleted. I believe it would be easy to find 50 or even 100 news citations for him. It is related to India's ongoing anti-CAA protests. He can be compared to a few young students who became famous in the U.S. in the wake of one school mass shooting. I think this one was in Florida and one of the students is named David Hogg though he is not in the 'news' much these days and therefore the name escapes me. I would love it if you could put in a word on the deletion discussion or send a word to the Admin who deleted the Sharjeel Imam page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachi bbsr (talk • contribs) 17:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

List of your created articles that are in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors

I'm trying to make a dent in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors, and a few articles you created have issues that I can't fix on my own. Basically, some refs linked via {{sfn}} and {{harvnb}} and similar have missing full citations or have some other problems. You can check these instructions to have error messages enabled (Svick's script is the simplest to use, but Trappist's script is a bit more refined if you're interested in doing deeper cleanup).

The following articles could use some of your attention

1. Ancient Greek literature
2. Andrew McNaughton
3. Aristagoras
4. Atticus of Constantinople
5. Battle of Ascalon
6. Battle of Myriokephalon
7. Battle of York
8. Byzantine Rite
9. Byzantine bureaucracy and aristocracy
10. Carians
11. Charles Poulett Thomson, 1st Baron Sydenham
12. Constantine IV
13. Danishmendids
14. Drusus Caesar
15. Duchy of Athens
16. Fifth Crusade
17. Guy I of Montlhéry
18. Hugh, Count of Vermandois
19. Isabella of Aragon, Queen of France
20. Ispahsalar
21. Jean de Brébeuf
22. John Strachan
23. Josef Hoffmann
24. Joseph Brant
25. Kingdom of Thessalonica
26. Latin Church in the Middle East
27. Leo II (emperor)
28. Ligures
29. Milo I of Montlhéry
30. Monterey Pop Festival
31. Médard des Groseilliers
32. Nur Jahan
33. Philip of Milly
34. Pons, Count of Tripoli
35. Roger of Salerno
36. Sam Hughes
37. Siege of Antioch

If you could add the full references to those article, that would be great. Again, the easiest way to deal with those is to install Svick's script per these instructions. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

... totam devastans Moraviam preter castra et loca munita.

Could you translate this clause? I think I know what it means, but it does not jive with how I read an author's footnote. So perhaps I don't know enough about 13th-century uses of praeter. Or the footnote is confusing. Thanks, Srnec (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! It all makes sense. Mongols indeed. Srnec (talk) 02:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Could you determine the age of this illustration

Hello. I have noticed that the art style of this illustration is not even remotely similar to other medieval art: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dame_guiraude_supplice.jpg

The foreshortening and other aspects of the artwork make it seem to be more like modern fantasy art than anything else. I don't speak French, but the text seems to be modern French. I know next to nothing about paleography, but even the handwriting seems to be modern.

But, the file itself is classified as being in the common domain due to age. I very much doubt it.

I didn't know where to bring this up, so I found a list of people who said that they're professional historians, I started from the top of the list, and I found that you're active. Maybe there is a better place to ask. BirdValiant (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Guenon

Please, help, there is an user who is vandalizing edits that have been arduous to this page René Guénon. Luceveritatis (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

I sent him a message to which he did not reply. Luceveritatis (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

I have received no message from Luceveritatis, nor does his contribs list show an edit to my talk page. A discussion has been opened on Talk:René Guénon which the editor has not commented in. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Help for Decision of a page Deletion tag

The Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 had been tagged for deletion for more than a week and the decision is not yet taken for the discussion [5],the nominator withdrawn his delete nomination but please decide based on the reasons provided.I would be very glad if the page was kept and I am asking your kind help because its annoying to see deletion tag on the page for more than a week.I did try to quick close it since the nominator withrawn his deletion claim.Sorry for that if it violate the rule.ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 09:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello

On https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rathore&action=history and many other rajput clan pages this chariotrider is engaging in disruptive edit warring and they already have edited the pages 4-5 times to the version they want it to be can you please block them this. chariotrider is also highly biased and adding propaganda to rajput pages has engaged in disruptive edit warring on various rajput related pages thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sungpeshwe9 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Solid Waste Management

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Solid Waste Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 13:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Natalis soli invicto!

		Natalis soli invicto!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Crusader states

Good morning!

An anonymous user has been randomly editing the numbers in the infobox on various pages related to the Crusades (Montgisard, Cresson and Hattin, etc) without actually replacing the sources and linking new ones. Said person is also seemingly replacing words (such as "cleric") out of various articles dedicated to what seems to be Muslim historical figures related to the Shia faith and seems to be motivated by personal political and religious beliefs..... The point I am trying to make is that this person seems more interested in vandalism than anything else and I am trying to understand why you are enabling such acts by reverting the pages back to the state he or she leaves them in when other users simply revert them back to their state pre-vandalism. (Jules Agathias (talk) 18:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC))

Hi Jules, I thought I was reverting the vandalism but apparently I didn't look closely enough, there were other edits that I missed. Sorry about that. Adam Bishop (talk) 19:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Crusades

You've indicated your interest in this topic. If you'd mind joining us at Talk:Crusades#A_proposal_and_a_possible_objection_against_it (the discussion so far seems to be mostly one user) that would be appreciated (if you have time for it, of course). Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Gerold of Lausanne

On 1 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gerold of Lausanne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gerold of Lausanne prohibited Catholic church services in Jerusalem in 1229? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gerold of Lausanne. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gerold of Lausanne), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Getting an editor to respond in a dispute

Hello. I have two disputes with the same editor who keeps on reverting an edit. I, user: Marshal277, believe that content from a Washington Post story ought to be in this article. user: Meters believes that it should not be. The case involves a student who attended the school and was taught by a teacher, who then allegedly sexually assaulted her immediately upon her graduation, and after he allegedly had groomed her for years. Administrators at the the school found out about it and did not bring it to the authorities, even as that teacher was second in command at the school. user: Meters believes that since the event occurred after the student graduated and took place off campus, it should not be on the schools page. It may be early, but user: Meters is not responding. Here are the two relevant articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Schools https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_School_at_River_Ridge

Here is the relevant section in dispute:

Sexual Abuse and Assault Allegations

In June of 2021, the Washington Post Ran a front page story detailing allegations of sexual and physical abuse of children who grew up in the People of Praise. One story focused on an event alleged to have occurred in 2001.

References

Dave Beskar

According to a police report obtained by The Post, in 2001, Trinity School at River Ridge teacher Dave Beskar sexually assaulted a 17-year-old female student, Katie Logan, in her home. Beskar denies the allegation.

Logan said that in 2006, she reported the incident to Dean of Girls Penny Arndt. Arndt told police that she reported Logan’s accusation to the president of the Trinity Schools board at the time, Kerry Koller. Arndt also told police that she reported Logan's accusation to the current president of Trinity Schools Jon Balsbaugh in 2009. Balsbaugh said to the police that he did not learn about the accusation until 2011, after Beskar had left the school. Balsbaugh said that he did not report the accusation to the police because he thought Logan was 18 at the time.

References

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 10:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Io, Saturnalia!

		Io, Saturnalia!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A token of thanks Hi Adam Bishop! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

"Orthodox Church of Byzantium" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Orthodox Church of Byzantium and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Orthodox Church of Byzantium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 02:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I am a many, many, grandson of Eleanor of Aquitaine. Please mail or email to me information you have about Eleanor of Aquitaine. Howard Fisher,1449 Bent Oaks Blvd, Deland, Florida / email: mail@howardfisher.com Also, I am now 78 years old and I to learn everything about my family history.H. Fisher,1449 Bent Oaks Blvd, Deland, FL 32724 mail@howardfisher.com

Send me what you have about Wueen Eleanor. H.Fisher, mail@howardfisher.com 1449 Bent Oaks Blvd, Deland, Florida 32724 2603:9001:1E07:300:A47D:1487:5214:C82E (talk) 03:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

"Callao, Chile" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Callao, Chile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 26#Callao, Chile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:31, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPMA Task force assessment

Template:WPMA Task force assessment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

To brighten your day

I was rereading an essay of W. H. Auden's ("The Poet and the City"), in which I noted this passage that might amuse you if you don't already know it:

But if a stranger in the train asks me my occupation, I never answer "writer" for fear that he may go on to ask me what I write, and to answer "poetry" would embarass us both, for we both know that nobody can earn a living simply by writing poetry. (The most satisfactory answer I have discovered, satisfactory because it withers curiosity, is to say Medieval Historian.)

—Deor (talk) 17:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Haha, that sounds about right. Adam Bishop (talk) 14:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"W. Thomas" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect W. Thomas and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § W. Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Kalends of January

		Happy New Year!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

"Charles Parnell" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Charles Parnell has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 1 § Charles Parnell until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 03:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Vicipaedia

Hi, Adam. I intended to write to you on this page before applying the security rule on Vicipaedia, where you haven't edited for some while now. I realise that I failed to do that, and I'm sorry, though I believe you would have received my emails.

Anyway, although your sysop tools on Vicipaedia are suspended for the present, you'll always be welcome to return. All you need to do is to ask, e.g. on the Taberna or on my talk page. I find (because Justin has just recently asked me to do this) that restoring admin rights is a much simpler job than suspending them :) Andrew Dalby 14:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Andrew, yes I did see your messages and e-mails - I actually forgot about renewing/restoring the sysop tools, so it's no problem at all, we can leave them suspended for now. If I need them back I will certainly let you know! Adam Bishop (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Curtis Joseph

Curtis Joseph has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

"Ferdinand I of Spain" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ferdinand I of Spain has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 29 § Ferdinand I of Spain until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 02:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Battle of Lade

Battle of Lade has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

"Tao Chi" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Tao Chi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 11 § Tao Chi until a consensus is reached. Jōkepedia (talk) 02:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Audita tremendi

Hey there, I saw that you were one of the first and only major contributors to the Audita tremendi article wayyyyy back (so cool to see that you're still active all this while - kudos!). Hope you don't the mind the fact that I sort of blew it up and started from scratch (I was mainly concerned about the wholesale copy-and-pasting of the full translation, which is most likely copyvio, as well as the lack of inline citations). I don't have access to that particular book by Riley-Smith though and it would be much appreciated if you'd like to add anything from there or whatever else currently needs adding in the article. Also did a bit of work on Quia maior if you're interested and I have half the mind to slowly rework all of the major "bull" articles that need reworking. Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 00:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

I don't mind! I hadn't looked at that article in awhile and I didn't even realize someone had copied in the entire translation. I don't have the Riley-Smith book anymore (although I can grab it from the university library). I'll see what I can do. Thanks for taking on these articles! Adam Bishop (talk) 01:21, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year

		Happy New Year!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

"Anglican church" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Anglican church has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Anglican church until a consensus is reached.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  06:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Lando (archbishop of Messina)

On 25 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lando (archbishop of Messina), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Archbishop Lando of Messina abandoned his archdiocese in 1238 and spent the rest of his life in his hometown of Anagni? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lando (archbishop of Messina). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lando (archbishop of Messina)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Emicho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emicho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emicho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

FAR notice

I have nominated Middle Ages for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 03:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Battle of the Yarmuk

Battle of the Yarmuk has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Battle of Plataea

Battle of Plataea has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert of Nantes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Fariskur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Io Saturnalia!

		Io, Saturnalia!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Battle of Thermopylae

Battle of Thermopylae has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hey adam! I have got question

About the source I have added in siege of jerusalem 1187, it should have its Wikipedia page I think because it was talking about another battle for jerusalem between salahdin and richard, what do you think? R3YBOl (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi R3YBOl, the book that you were using, "Islam Instrumentalized", is not a very good source for the crusades. First of all, it's mostly about modern economics. It doesn't really have anything to do with the crusades or medieval history at all. Second, I can tell just from the numbers that the author is not an historian and the book is not a history book: there's no chance Richard had an army of 700,000 and that Saladin killed 300,000 of them in one day, and this couldn't refer to the siege of Jerusalem in 1187 anyway, since Richard's crusade arrived in 1191. Richard and Saladin also never fought a battle or siege in Jerusalem. Third, it's a bit difficult to see what the author of "Islam Instrumentalized" has done because the quotation marks and citations are a bit strange, but he's actually quoting (and disagreeing with) a different book, "The Colors of Violence: Cultural Identities, Religion, and Conflict." That book also seems to be quoting someone else, but I'm not sure what, since it doesn't cite any source...so basically, neither of them are reliable sources for the Siege of Jerusalem or the Third Crusade. This is actually a really good example to help us remember that just because something is written in a book, it doesn't mean it's a good source for Wikipedia. Adam Bishop (talk) 12:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Ok, Thank you for your response and help, Have a good day R3YBOl (talk) 14:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)