User talk:Adri K.

Welcome!

Hello, Adri K., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Titles

Some transliterations between Wikipedia ID and Wikipedia EN are not so funny - some editors find it hard to understand I suspect - maybe -. cheers Satu Suro 11:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denials

The indiginous inhabitants (the Papuans, not the Javanese the government has been resettling since 1969) might have something different to say about your denial of an occupation. And its fun to see you invoking the USAs criminal actions as some kind of twisted defence - "but mum! ALL the kids are doing it!" - since Indonesia is only capable of doing these things because it is a client-state of the USA. LamontCranston 4:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them. -- > A reference of American citizens who approved atrocities committed by his so-great nation ALL OVER THE WORLD. And you're wonderiny why the world hates you?

Indonesia never occupied Irian Jaya.

the Papuans might say otherwise.

But not all Papuans.

Indonesia, client state of USA? Well I bet the people here will tell you something VERY different!

Then they should look at who sells arms to Indonesia, whose corporations their government does so much to provide for (which includes violent suppression of Indonesian people), and who gives the orders when large scale military actions occur.

Source?

You need to come to the field to tell it accurately. Have you ever visit Irian Jaya?

You know perfectly well that foreigners are not allowed to visit Wes Papua, unless they work for the Freeport-McMoRan Mine (which is owned and operated by who? That's right, an American corporation)

Source?

I dare to say that foreigners provoked them to gain their independence, so they could control resources there more comfortably.

West Papuans ought to be free to make their choice, and if history is any indication then that choice would be total independence or some kind of strong territorial autonomy, as for resources as I have already pointed out the Americans already control the resources, a change in the governing of West Papua is the last thing they'd want because if the Papuans were in charge then they'd probably take a dim view on the mines pollution (my understanding is that their view is if the mine can be operated as cleanly as it would have to be in a first world nation then it can stay but if not then they want it shut down - while the Indonesian government lets the mine dump all its toxic waste and silt straight into the river system).

Lacking source.

But Indonesia is the country with great history that you'd never imagine. Our motto, Unity in Diversity, isn't for nothing. You know nothing about us.

Where is the unity in a central authority in Jakarta (appointed by the Americans) running everything by force? LamontCranston (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who has been appointed by the Americans? Again, lacking source.

Georginho (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign relations of Indonesia

In your recent edit - you appear to removed one referenced item and placed an item which is not referenced - I am not sure what you mean by facts - but your edit has not provided any and removed another Satu Suro 04:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So if you wish to remove the referenced item about one item - and then add another about a totally different subject - then you need to do two edits with adequate summaries - otherwise your edit appears to be covering for the removal of one item by providing a totally different replacement. Such a change without adequate edit summary will be reverted Satu Suro 04:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hhtimeturner.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Hhtimeturner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Harmonia Progressio restored

Article In Harmonia Progressio was restored as originally written. Someone had changed it to an invalid redirect. Please work on it to assert notability. It is also very short and another editor may tag it for deletion. Good luck. -- Alexf⁴² 12:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Naruto chibiShino.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Naruto chibiShino.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]