User talk:Akashkunal

November 2008

The recent edit you made to Akshay singh constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. smadge1 (talk) 20:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Akshay singh

A tag has been placed on Akshay singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Flewis^(talk) 10:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Lady Jugnauth.jpg

Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Lady Jugnauth.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0a5V3Tn0Gt0FK/610x.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Lady Jugnauth.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.

If you believe that the image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under a free license then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave me a message explaining the details and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the <pick a free licence> or released into the public domain leave me a message at my talk page with a link to where I can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Lady Jugnauth.jpg]].
Or alternately drop me a note about this file if I have misunderstood something.
- Peripitus (Talk) 11:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Ramgoolam in office.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ramgoolam in office.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Please refrain from uploading copyrighted images under free licenses. All images have been deleted and edits rolled back. This is the second such time this has happened; if you continue to do this, you will be blocked. Black Kite 18:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly uploading copyrighted images under free licenses. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite 10:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

Yet again you have uploaded an image (this time, a town seal) and claimed that you own the copyright to it. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely. Please read this page for details on licenses for uploading images. If you then make an unblock request on this page (see WP:UNBLOCK) showing that you have read and understood that page, that you know why what you are doing is wrong, and that you will not do it again, then I am willing to unblock you (and I'm sure any other admin will too). Black Kite 18:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC) (Struck after later socking and repeated infringements). Black Kite 20:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Le reduit (5).gif

Thank you for uploading File:Le reduit (5).gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Le reduit (2).gif

Thank you for uploading File:Le reduit (2).gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]