User talk:Amazedturnip760

September 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Women in ancient Egypt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Women in ancient Egypt was changed by Amazedturnip760 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889132 on 2018-09-12T18:48:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Battle Royale seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:04, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fortnite

Fortnite sucks though and i stated the facts without bias. Fortnite is widely played by childeren even though its age rating deems it inappropriate for that audience. I advised the reader to avoid this game using facts and k believe my edit should be re added. Thanks. Amazedturnip760 (talk) 17:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at T series. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 15:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Super Bowl LIII, you may be blocked from editing. Strikerforce^Talk 18:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 18:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amazedturnip760 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have tried to help wtf guys. My last edit disn’t even show on the page, it was in the notes of a page to prevent vandalism. Smh

Decline reason:

As far as I can see you have not made a single constructive edit. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 19:55, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Amazedturnip760 (talk) 19:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I was the user that both reverted your last edit and made the report that led to your block. Regardless of whether or not the edit in question "shows on the page", the information that you placed within the hidden note was, itself, vandalism. The blocking administrator also took into account your editing history, which shows only a couple of useful edits and multiple other vandalism edits. Thus, it was determined that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopedia, but rather to be disruptive. Strikerforce^Talk 19:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kinu: Pinging the blocking admin. Strikerforce^Talk 19:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Considering you had added that vandalism to the article also, you'll have to excuse my incredulity at your statement about trying to prevent others from doing it. I stand by this block. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]