User talk:Amorker

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Alex 101. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Dakota ~ 18:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. ×Meegs 19:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:New Liverpool Shirt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:New Liverpool Shirt.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:New Liverpool Shirt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:New Liverpool Shirt.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BrownCow  (how now?) 22:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to PlayStation 3

Your recent edit to PlayStation 3 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Irishguy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. delldot | talk 15:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

--Slowking Man 15:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey...It seems that we are both targeted by IRISHGUY and DISLIKE him. He is not a very nice person and I do not appreciate his contributions or lack there of. I am glad that we seem to agree in our opinion of this guy.

Yayacaca 02:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]