User talk:Andde14

This is Andde14's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tage wie diese has been accepted

Tage wie diese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passenger pigeon (talk) 12:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Der Krach der Republik (2013 Die Toten Hosen album).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Der Krach der Republik (2013 Die Toten Hosen album).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Der Krach der Republik has been accepted

Der Krach der Republik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krach der Republik (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Der Krach der Republik instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krach der Republik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Krach der Republik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andde14! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"sources" in Der Krach der Republik

Hi Andde14. I just had a look at Der Krach der Republik and almost all the "sources" you added are promotional links to the person's webpage, which I had to remove. This creates a major issue since the purpose of sources is verification, leaving the entire article without verification. In fact, the article includes only a single source outside the charts and certifications sections, and I can't evaluate the reliablility of this single source since it is in German. I would suggest to draftify this article giving you a chance to fix it, but it is up to you. Without sources, the entirety of these sections could be challenged and removed by any editor. --Muhandes (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add discogs as source, see WP:RSPSS. --Muhandes (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Without these sources, I can´t verify anything at all in this article. This is no problem for the german version of this article, however. So I guess I´m taking my chances with it. Andde14 (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at the German version, and it doesn't use any of these "sources", nor does it use discogs. It uses the album's booklet as a source, which of course is a valid source if you have it and can verify the facts. --Muhandes (talk) 15:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I stand corrected. But please give me your reason why you changed the layout of the CD 1/2 part. Same layout was used in german version of the article Andde14 (talk) 08:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "layout of the CD 1/2 part", can you point to the edit in which I made that change? It is probably something I did unintentionally. Also, what does "Begleitheft" mean? We try to use English in the English Wikipedia. --Muhandes (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant the Track Listing. I will change it back to how I intended it to be, so you can see the difference. I also changed "Begleitheft" to "booklet". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andde14 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, maybe I I did something unintentionally, but even more likely, it was another editor. I improved the citation format on the booklet. You can add other parameters if you have them. By the way, you removed the cover image, is there a reason for that? --Muhandes (talk) 13:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I misunderstood the text to the new picture and thought it´d be deleted next week. Thanks for all of your help btw Andde14 (talk) 07:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alles ohne Strom(2019 Die Toten Hosen album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alles ohne Strom(2019 Die Toten Hosen album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alles ohne Strom has been accepted

Alles ohne Strom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]