User talk:BabiesCon

This is BabiesCon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Borderline (artwork) (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article's sources do not verify the interpretations of the artwork. The cited articles are mostly about the closing of the exhibit due to complaints from its neighbors, and do not mention anything about the different interpretations that are given here, which appear to be largely original thought.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Borderline (artwork) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BabiesCon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple user names?

I note that both you and BabiesInc have worked on Draft:Borderline (artwork). Are you the same person? If so, you would do best to choose a single username to work with. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Telephone (artwork)

The article Telephone (artwork) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The three sources (which seem to use the same text anyway) only mention the telephone, no indication that it is actually a notable work of art

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Telephone (artwork) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telephone (artwork) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telephone (artwork) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 14:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf Hitler Fan Club

I reverted your edits to Adolf Hitler Fan Club because the subject is not notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding statistics from ArtFacts

While your interest and efforts on WP in relation to the visual arts are appreciated, I have to ask that you please stop adding statistics sourced to ArtFacts to articles. There are several reasons for that. Firstly, statistics like this change from week to week, month to month and year to year. There is no way for our volunteer editors to keep up with these changes, which are a form of WP:RECENTISM and should be avoided. In a nutshell, Recentism is "an inflated or imbalanced focus on recent events. It is writing without an aim toward a long-term, historical view." Because WP is an encylopedia, we take the long term historical view on how an artist is perceived and represented in reliable sources. Secondly, ArtFacts is a database, it is not journalism nor scholarly art history. It simply aggregates information. Please stop adding these ArtFact stats ever-fluctuating "statistics" to articles. Additionally, you are not formatting citations properly, please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see what you mean. But couldn't there be made an argument to include the ranking number in the artist infobox much like for example a sports ranking which also is variable?— Preceding unsigned comment added by BabiesCon (talk • contribs)

No, for the same reasons stated above, and it is not encyclopedic, nor stable, nor reliable. Netherzone (talk) 13:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adolf Hitler Fan Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adolf Hitler Fan Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Hitler Fan Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Adolf Hitler Club" redirects vandalism

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Owen× ☎ 08:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 14:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]