Jump to content

User talk:Blocked1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

22 March 2009 - Warning

[edit]

With certain obvious exceptions, although never quite being vandalism, on the whole your edits have not been particularly productive. I'm sure you are aware that a repeated history of nuisance edits will lead to restrictions on your ability to edit WP.

  • 06:01, 22 March 2009 (hist) (diff) Candi Staton - not useful - reverted
  • 06:00, 22 March 2009 (hist) (diff) Your Love (Frankie Knuckles song) - no visible difference
  • 06:00, 22 March 2009 (hist) (diff) 12 cm Minenwerfer M 15 - no visible difference
  • 05:59, 22 March 2009 (hist) (diff) Peter Mullan - very dubious - corrected
  • 05:50, 22 March 2009 (hist) (diff) Peter Mullan ‎- dubious
  • 05:49, 22 March 2009 (hist) (diff) Peter Mullan ‎- more useful
  • 05:48, 22 March 2009 (hist) (diff) Peter Mullan ‎- useful, perhaps
  • 09:19, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Peter Mullan ‎- confusing
  • 08:22, 22 October 2008 (hist) (diff) Peter Mullan ‎- productive
  • 08:21, 22 October 2008 (hist) (diff) Kordíky ‎- no visible difference
  • 08:20, 22 October 2008 (hist) (diff) m Peter Mullan ‎- useful
  • 08:02, 14 January 2008 (hist) (diff) Peter Mullan ‎- inappropriate - reverted

Pdfpdf (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

28 March 2009

[edit]

Look sunshine, I have no interest in persecuting you, but in the absence of you explaining either what you did or why you did it, the politest "spin" I can put on your latest edit is that it is "unhelpful". You really are straining "good faith"; and more of this an I will no longer be assuming "good faith". Got the message? If you think I'm being unreasonable, by all means respond and state your justification. But any more of these unexplained ambiguous edits will be treated as vandalism, with the resulting consequences. Got the picture? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

4 May 2009

[edit]

Regarding these edits, you are doing it again. If there is a good reason for doing this, then explain the reason. Otherwise, it is just vandalism, and like all of your other unexplained unhelpful edits, it has been reverted. Pdfpdf (talk) 03:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]