User talk:CharlotteGoiar

Welcome!

Hello, CharlotteGoiar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 21:38, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Harry Benjamin Syndrome

An article that you have been involved in editing, Harry Benjamin Syndrome, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Benjamin Syndrome. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hfarmer (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits on Harry Benjamin's Syndrome

Please do not revert the formatting changes and notification made by User:Rjanag. If you would like to discuss the sourcing, none of which was removed, please do so on the talk page. Rjanag simply formatted them to meet Wikipedia's manual of style. I have reverted them. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 21:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just left the text and the sources as they were written there today, I couldn't see them on my browser, so I just restored them. I will not revert current formatting changes and notification made by user Rjanag. --CharlotteGoiar (talk) 22:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Harry Benjamin's Syndrome

An article that you have been involved in editing, Harry Benjamin's Syndrome, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Benjamin's Syndrome. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jokestress (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Harry Benjamin's Syndrome. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

Specifically, what was the purpose of this revert, which removed reference formatting? rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 08:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned you at the administrator's noticeboard because you admitted you intend to use Wikipedia as part of a crusade. It is in your best interest not to ignore this message like you ignored my previous one. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CharlotteGoiar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:39, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this your last and only final warning. Any further sockpuppetry and you will be blocked. --Kanonkas : Talk 15:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

It has become apparent that you are not here to build the encyclopedia, but instead you are using it to promote your novel original research invented disease. Wikipedia is not the venue to do that. You appear to be vandalizing in retaliation for the articles being deleted - which is indicating that your intentions here are disruptive and not compatible with the encyclopedia.

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original research. We reflect what other reliable independent sources report, in verifyable publications or sources. We do not exist to be used to advertise ideas or fight external publicity battles.

As your activities are completely at odds with Wikipedia's purpose of existence I have placed and indefinite block on your editing. Please do not recreate the content in question via IP editing. If you are willing to abide by Wikipedia policy, stop disrupting, and not try to promote your ideas here any further you can request an uninvolved independent administrators' review here as the template below indicates.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Checkuser confirmed. Checked relating to continued disruption of AfD/ANI by an anon editor - Alison ^❤ 00:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]