User talk:Cruxstylus
Cruxstylus, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Cruxstylus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC) |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Cruxstylus! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:40, Wednesday, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Cruxstylus! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:46, Wednesday, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Cruxstylus! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:46, Wednesday, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cadcorp, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OLE and Com (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Blue Prism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to David Moss
- Cybertill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Private
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media5-fone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Application (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imagen Ltd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Overlinking
[edit]Hello, I'm BlackcurrantTea. I noticed that in this edit, you wikilinked London. This is generally not done unless there is some doubt as to whether an article is referring to London, England or some other London; it is considered overlinking. Please see the Manual of Style entry on what generally should not be linked. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Red links, "Removed broken links" and "removed dead link"
[edit]Wikilinks like Alex d’Agapeyeff that are red, because they do not lead to articles, are usually called "red links". They can be useful if someone creates an article of that name, and they highlight the possible need for an article of that name. See Wikipedia:Red link.
Sometimes wikilinks get broken. For example London#Climate leads to the climate section of the article on London. If someone renamed that section, it would break the wikilink. For example London#Weather simply leads to the article on London because there is no section title called Weather.
Dead links are links to external sites that either no longer work, or no longer lead to the article intended. Please do not delete them. It can be helpful to find the links on a web archive. Or if the website has changed its URLs, to find the new URL for the article sites. See Wikipedia:Link rot.
Please try to use the right terminology. If you use edit summaries such as "Removed broken links" or "removed dead link" it can alarm other editors. Toddy1 (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- I ran into a couple of similar edits at about the same time frame and wanted to drop a note, but see that it's already covered. Sorry, Cruxstylus, that I had to revert you, but it is not normally a good idea to remove red links if there is even a remote possibility that they will become live at some point in the near or distant future. Even as red links they already serve a purpose, f.e. "What links here" already works for them and thereby allows to build infrastructure (even across multiple language entities of Wikipedia) and sort out needs for disambiguation long before the articles exist. Greetings, --Matthiaspaul (talk) 20:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Limango concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Limango, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Limango
[edit]
Hello, Cruxstylus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Limango".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Redgate Software
[edit]
Hello, I'm Mrh30. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Redgate have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mrh30 (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Potential UPE farm(s). Thank you. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 16:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)