User talk:Denis19

Welcome

Hello, Denis19! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Mr. Credible (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Establishment categories

About this and (apparently) many others, these were not established in Germany and do not qualify for that and similar annual categories. You might want to discuss @ the appropriate WikiProject pages before doing any more wholesale categorization. I don't look forward to undoing all your HotCat additions and it's not a good use of anyone's time. Best! PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 15:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The SS formations in question were established by the SS which - as you might know - was located in Germany. Please raise the issue with the approbriate noticeboard if you disagree. --Denis19 (talk) 16:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The order was issued, however the units themselves were established in their respective occupied territories. The category is established "in" Germany not "by German authorities". 16:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

If that is how you see it, please try and find a consensus rather than simply revert my edits. --Denis19 (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to add content, the onus is on you to make the case. We already have appropriate categories for the establishment of military units. Personally, your use of the category appears to be outside the intended use as exemplified by articles categorized in other years. Establishing an army, for example, would apply, not army units. The categories is NOT intended for indicating the establishment of subsidiaries, so you entire use entering all SS units is ill-advised and inappropriate. PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 17:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Currently it is you who argues against sources. So it is for you to find a consensus to delete sourced information, if you believe that these categories should not be used in this case. --Denis19 (talk) 17:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, hang a label on editors so you can attack them. That will help your case. Not arguing against sources at all, only your abuse of the intent of the category. PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 23:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Dodo19 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Denis19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a mistake! Obviously it was a poor choice to have a username starting with the letter D and ending in the number 19. Apart from that, if using Hotcat is a crime, just disable the thing. Personal attacks like this, actually reveal more serious problems than adding some categories nationalist editors from Eastern Europe don't like. Denis19 (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Syrthiss (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Denis19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not see, what I have done wrong, exept for pissing of some Eastern European nationalists who do not like to see their WWII heros as Nazi collaborators. So, where is the damage done to Wikipedia? Where is the disruption caused? Why are my edits not useful? Basically, this is a shoot first, ask questions later policy. I wonder how this corresponds to the five pillars mentioned above. Denis19 (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There's nothing in this request that I can review, since you do not address the reasons for your block. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.