User talk:Edmount

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Edmount! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edmount, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Edmount! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Tour (Maroon 5 tour), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Juan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Posner discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Valentine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Sugar (Maroon 5 song)

Hi Edmount. I am reaching our to discuss this edit. While I understand that you want the template to display "Diamond", the consensus is to list the number of Platinum awards in the template and not Diamond, and this is how it is done in the hundreds of other articles for albums/singles with diamond award. If you think this should change feel free to request this change at Template talk:Certification Table Entry. Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 11:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was heading here to leave you this exact comment. By not filling the edit summary field you are showing contempt to fellow editors' time, which need to spend time unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. --Muhandes (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeless

Please note that disambiguation pages like Timeless are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Basically, neither Sofia Carson nor Sofia Carson discography mentions the song "Timeless", so there is no article for readers who want to read more about it. If the album and song were added to the discography article, then that article could be used to support listing the song on the DAB page. Leschnei (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sophie Muller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamonds Are Forever.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camila Cabello, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 21.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of TheRedundancy125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"2008 Summer Tour (Maroon 5 and Counting Crows)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2008 Summer Tour (Maroon 5 and Counting Crows) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 22#2008 Summer Tour (Maroon 5 and Counting Crows) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 00:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008 Summer Tour (Maroon 5 and Counting Crows) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Summer Tour (Maroon 5 and Counting Crows) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Summer Tour (Maroon 5 and Counting Crows) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films set in 2104 has been nominated for merging

Category:Films set in 2104 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]