User talk:Ernst.schnell

:de:

Please, no links to the German (or other-language) Wikipedia, it's too much of a surprise for someone who is blind, for example. Use {{ill}} instead, but not in an article lead because it results in a red link (with a little blue "(de)", and red links in the lead are frowned upon. For the thing you linked, you find it further down the page. - Best thing would be to translate the German article, which I planned to do today, but then I found Aleida Assmann in sad condition, and do only one per day ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verwaltung der Staatlichen Schlösser und Gärten Hessen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Verwaltung der Staatlichen Schlösser und Gärten Hessen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 20:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whispering, I looked a bit. This is an official state agency, I wouldn't know where to look for sources, other than the official website which I added from the German article. Help? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The German Wikipedia page for this article, is pretty much just a collection of links. You might want to ask for help over at Wikiproject Germany. The problem here is that at the english Wikipedia we need more than just primary sources for inclusion on the english wikipedia per the general notability guideline. Whispering^(t) 15:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and no. Every university is notable, for example, - and this is part of a ministry. We had a discussion for Hochschule für Musik Mainz. What would be a more reliable source than the official website, in both cases of state organizations? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably worth mentioning that this article was direct translation of the wikipedia.de article, which seemed good enough over there. Ernie (talk) 16:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Karben DE Karte.png

The file File:Karben DE Karte.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]