User talk:Evil Slug

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 02:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aryeh Lebowitz deleted

Please review Wikipedia's policy on notability. Basically, no reliable sources that establish significance — no consideration. El_C 02:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aryeh Lebowitz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aryeh Lebowitz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from bknw.org/about-us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not contravene WP:COPYVIO. Make sure you write your own original prose. El_C 19:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've really been on some strange right-wing tear recently. I am going to drop a template here warning you about discretionary sanctions; if someone had done that before I'd likely just have topic-banned you from political topics. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

  Just another example of Wikipedia's leftist bias --Evil Slug (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I feel harassed by someone quoting a mass murderer for inspiration Evil Slug (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have contributions you want to make to this encyclopedia, then please go and make them and refrain from commenting on the user pages of others. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll keep that in mind Evil Slug (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Evil Slug! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikipedia Bias Ratings, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]