User talk:FGiella

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 69.181.253.230 (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, FGiella's multiple reversions at Syd Shores constitute edit-warring, and that editor is close to a 3RR violation. We do not remove properly footnoted, reliable-source citations. As regards the editor's edit summaries, 1) anyone can claim to be anyone on Wikipedia, and 2) Wikipedia does not use claims of personal knowledge or personal speculation. Alter Ego is an extremely authoritative source in this field. Contact the magazine if you personally believe the magazine is wrong. --Tenebrae (talk) 06:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be continuing your edit-war under an anonymous IP address, 96.232.186.27. Anyone can come to Wikipedia and claim to be anybody they want. You could simply be a fan trying to whitewash history. You could be an art dealer trying to burnish the reputation of an artist whose work you're trying to sell. Who knows? If this were real, Joe Giella would go to Alter Ego and have editor Roy Thomas run a correction. But you're not doing that. If that happens, cite it. Until then, stop disrupting Wikipedia or we'll need to ask for admin intervention to block this account and protect the article from anon IPs. --Tenebrae (talk) 05:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017, creators

You need to cite a source if you want to add a creator.
Not every creator gets credit becuse their contribution was minimal, what exactly is it that Joe Giella supposedly did for all these character?
If you're really the son of the creator please don't do stuff like this, you're biased and that's not really allowed.★Trekker (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Treker as a writer you should want all creators credited. the inker creates the final look of the character.

Not really, not really and not really to all of those things. I'm not a writer in that way, at least not yet. I don't think everyone in general should be credited as a "creator" specifically, and I don't get how the inker is nesserely responsible for a characters final look.

As for your comment on my talkpage, you still need to have a source which confirms your claim and I'm not really interested in doing that for you right now, I have my own stuff going on. If you want your supposed father mentioned in the articles you can expand on the characters publication history section.★Trekker (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Treker, thanks for your response. and thanks for writing articles. my dad was an inker at DC for almost 50 years. he would have meetings with the editor, writer and penciller and they would come up with designs. the penciller in many of these cases was Carmine Infantino his pencils are were very loose which means the inker would often re-pencil then ink the characters. Especially during the silver age. my dad or Murphy Anderson would redraw his pencils before inking. My dad is still alive if you want to interview him and hear the process i can give you his phone # this way your article will be more accurate. my email is FGiella@aol.com i can give you his phone # and you can get the info from a primary source! so the way you see it in the comic book is the final product produced by the inker. most people feel inkers don't get the respect or credit they deserve. I'm just trying to give artistic credit. If you worked on an artice you would like credit. all writers and artists deserve to be treated fairly. please help us with this :) also, Marvel seems to credit inkers as co-creators.

You need to cite an independent reliable source if you want to prove any of that and have it added to the articles. Primary sources are not okay on wikipedia like that, it would be considered original research on my part.★Trekker (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]