User talk:Fastcar4924539

February 2024

Hello, I'm Ertal72. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Snejana Onopka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ertal72 (talk) 03:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ani Gafafyan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ani Gafafyan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Nicholas Galitzine, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Suonii180 (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

its not a mistake, because all i did was change his infobox to infobox actor since he is an actor.. Fastcar4924539 (talk) 20:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nina Dobrev. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Thedarkknightli (talk) 07:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how so it's unconstructive? as well as disruptive, im adding more info about her.. Fastcar4924539 (talk) 07:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nina Dobrev. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Fastcar4924539 (talk) 07:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nina Dobrev. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thedarkknightli (talk) 07:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fastcar4924539!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Suonii180 (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FirstVIEW moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to FirstVIEW. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 07:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ines Crnokrak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ines Crnokrak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ines Crnokrak. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024.

I have reverted your edit at the article Estonians. There are approximately one million ethnic Estonians worldwide, with the vast majority of them residing in Estonia. The primary language is Estonian. There are far more ethnic Estonians and their descendants in Finland, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Sweden than in Russia or "post Soviet spaces", yet those languages aren't included. The Estonian worldwide diaspora speak many languages depending on the country they are living in. Why would you put Russian as a language spoken? Russian-speaking Estonians are a minority, even within the worldwide diaspora. ExRat (talk) 02:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

russian is spoken with estonians in post soviet places it's just apart of our culture...., i myself am estonian from moscow... Fastcar4924539 (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

actually you're wrong, there are many estonians in siberia, remember those on articles showing u how many estonians in russia are dual citizens, but ethnic estonians mostly reside in siberia, Fastcar4924539 (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm not wrong. By your logic, we should place Finnish, English, Swedish, German, Russian, Norwegian, and every other language of places that Estonians or people of Estonian ethnicity reside. Even then, Russian would probably be about fifth, behind other languages. ExRat (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no because estonians are still present in former eastern bloc countries lol Fastcar4924539 (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

theres not a notable presence of estonians in norway nor germany, Fastcar4924539 (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Estonians, or people claiming Estonian descent: Russia = 7,778. Australia = 7,543. Germany = 6,286. Norway = 5,092. Russia has only marginally more. How is a mere few hundred, or one thousand, somehow a more notable presence? Compare that to Finland, the US, Canada, Sweden, or the UK. Again, why would you think the Russian language should be included? ExRat (talk) 18:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wheres your source regarding those numbers? Do u know how many Estonians that still reside in post soviet countries? theres still a sizable communtiy in central asia and in russia, belarus, ukraine Fastcar4924539 (talk) 20:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are literally referenced in the navigation box of the article Estonians. There actually isn't a sizable community in Central Asia and in Russia, Belarus, Ukraine. The largest populations of ethnic Estonians outside of Estonia are: Finland, Sweden, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Russia isn't even in the top five of places with a significant population of Estonians. The vast majority of ethnic Estonians reside in Estonia. The language section refers to the primary language of most ethnic Estonians – that language is Estonian. I see you also placed Russian as a primary language for ethnic Estonians in Finland (which I reverted). In what universe are ethnic Estonians living in Finland speaking Russian as their primary language? ExRat (talk) 17:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

those marks of finish estonians, sweden etc are migrants from estonia... Fastcar4924539 (talk) 22:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violations of WP:BLP

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Edita Vilkevičiūtė. You have already been notified about this, yet you are still adding unsourced content to biographies of living people. TylerBurden (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Vlada Roslyakova. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Continuing issue at this and other articles of living people, particularly with models from Eastern Europe. TylerBurden (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is it unrefrrenced Fastcar4924539 (talk) 18:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you actually still don't understand how your edits are unreferenced, I'm not sure you should be editing Wikipedia at all. Have you even clicked on any of the many links sent to you explaining how referencing works? WP:VERIFY for example. If you think you're a reliable source, well you're not. TylerBurden (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Vlada Roslyakova. Next time you will be reported. TylerBurden (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sawyer777. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Armenian Americans, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The sources already cited do not mention Armenians from Lebanon speaking Turkish. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 06:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FirstVIEW for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FirstVIEW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FirstVIEW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 13:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afghans in Iran, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turkmen and Uzbek. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Britni Stanwood

The article Britni Stanwood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, WP:NMODEL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]