User talk:Geierstein41

Orphaned non-free image File:Edinburgh Edition of the Waverley Novels, Guy Mannering photo.pdf

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edinburgh Edition of the Waverley Novels, Guy Mannering photo.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

M'Crie surname

Three generations of M'Crie ministers, Thomas M'Crie (both elder and younger) and Charles Greig M'Crie, are best known by their published writings, all of which appeared under the name "M'Crie", despite having been issued by numerous different publishers. They obviously must have been happy with this spelling, though the signature of M'Crie the elder which appears in his son's biography of him does look rather like M^cCrie: https://archive.org/details/lifeofthomasmcri00mcri/page/n9 . Given that these men are best known at the present day through their published writings, why change the orthography just because of what DNB says? Incidentally the more recent Dictionary of Scottish Church History and Theology has all three as "M'Crie", as does Ecclegen: https://ecclegen.com/ministers-mac/#-C . I accept that the apostrophe and superscript "c" are interchangeable, but I still feel you should revert these edits. The other well known Christian author and minister of this period for whom the apostrophe spelling predominates is Robert Murray M'Cheyne--PeterR2 (talk) 19:11, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this convincing point. I have reverted as you suggest, and there is now a redirection in operation which takes care of my own concern. Geierstein41 (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		For your excellent fillings out of our, in general, rather perfunctory articles on the novels of The Master. Your good work doesn't go unnoticed. --Antiquary (talk) 10:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this encouragement. I plan to work through the novels as other tasks allow. Geierstein41 (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivanhoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Ballantyne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for alerting me to this. I've fixed it now and will bear it in mind for future edits. Geierstein41 (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Abbot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Waverley and John Ballantyne

Kenilworth (novel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Ballantyne

The Monastery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Ballantyne

The Pirate (novel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Ballantyne

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Abbot, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waverley and John Ballantyne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Ronan's Well, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Betrothed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rob Roy (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waverley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edinburgh edition of the waverley novels moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Edinburgh edition of the waverley novels, because of tonality and issues. It needs to be rewritten and referenced to comply with Wikipedia guidelines. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 16:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Edinburgh edition of the Waverley novels

Hello, Geierstein41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edinburgh edition of the Waverley novels".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The mountain bard

Hello Geierstein41,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, The mountain bard for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, The Mountain Bard.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edinburgh edition of the Waverley novels has been accepted

Edinburgh edition of the Waverley novels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Geierstein41

Thank you for creating Scottish Pastorals.

User:Eddie891, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! I have redirected this page to its author, James Hogg. It may be a notable topic, but as it stands is not suitable for the articlespace. See WP:NBOOK for more information about how to establish the notability of a book, or look at other similar books. The main thing I note is that the article needs a section on reception to show that it is notable for a stand alone article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eddie891}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891:

Hello Eddie891. I think this page should qualify under 5 '5.The book's author is so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study.' Hogg is an accepted major writer, so even this small work is worth a page to give a bit more than the author page does. It was his first publication, and unlike his other works did not attract reviews when it appeared. That is why I there is no reception section on the page. I could put something in to that effect and mention recent revaluation, but its real significance is in being Hogg's first publication.

What do you advise?

Geierstein41 (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! As I see it, there are two options you have here. I'd agree with you that Hogg is a very notable author. While I cannot speak as to whether Hogg is notable enough to make anything inherently notable, I'll defer to you. The Edinburgh Companion of James Hogg says "His self-published first collection of poems, Scottish Pastorals (1801), received almost no attention." (p. 39)

As the article you created stood, the only cited text was "In 1800, most likely August or September, Hogg had time on his hands during a trip to Edinburgh to sell sheep. Aware of his poetic gift—though only one poem of his had so far appeared in print, in The Scots Magazine for 1794—he found a printer's shop next to the market, wrote out 'a poem or two' from memory, and had them printed as a 62-page boooklet." which you could incorporate into Hogg's article.
Should you be willing to expand the article to its own article, I'd suggest incorporating more information, such as from The Edinburgh Companion about its reception (or lack thereof). Searching this query "Scottish Pastorals" "James Hogg" on google books should provide some useful sources.

It might also be useful for you to create a draft in your sandbox to expand the article before publishing it. If you would like more help about what expansion might look like, use {{Re|Eddie891}} to respond to me, and I'd be happy to assist in the writing of this article! Hope that is helpful, and best wishes Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Edie891: This is very helpful. I think the first possibility would be out of proportion for the main Hogg article. That needs some work, which I intend to do before long, but I wouldn't be aiming to make the mentions of individual works more substantial. So I've done a revision in my sandbox which I'll submit for review. This adds a reception section which in this case concentrates on recent discussions, which are on my shelves. Usually I'd be chary of doing this, since for most significant works there is so much material, and attempts to summarise it in Wiki tend to be anecdotal or almost inevitably subjective to some extent. But for the Scottish Pastorals the material is limited, and since there is nothing contemporaneous I am content to make an exception.

I look forward to seeing what you think of the revision.

Many thanks for your help.

Geierstein41 (talk) 11:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Scottish Pastorals, from its old location at User:Geierstein41/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 12:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scottish Pastorals has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scottish Pastorals. Thanks! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft is now in mainspace at Scottish Pastorals. Thanks for your submission. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 14:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Scott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waverley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks: I've removed the links for the overture titles which aren't really necessary anyway.Geierstein41 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lady of the Lake (poem), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marmion and George Ellis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks: now fixed. Geierstein41 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Rokeby (poem) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Erskine

The Field of Waterloo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Murray

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castle Dangerous, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barbour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter summaries

Hi @Geierstein41: I don't think chapter summaries are normal practice. I've not seen that format used anywhere else. Plot is usually the gig. scope_creep^Talk 11:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi scope creep Plot summaries vary widely, from the skeletal to the exhaustive (and exhausting). Chapter summaries tend to be more uniform. They are at the least a useful supplement, and for some purposes certainly easier to use. People can use either or both as their needs and preferences dictate. Scott and Hogg have now pretty complete sets of chapter summaries. Hopefully other authors will be so favoured in due course. Ulysses is a particularly prominent example already in existence. Geierstein41 (talk)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]