User talk:Hamimh2

July 2024

Hello, I'm Remsense. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vacuum without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Remsense诉 00:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Vacuum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Remsense诉 00:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Hamimh2! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 22:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Bad summaries and puzzling change

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but recent edits of yours to the pages Sadomasochism and Googolplex have an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.

I have undone that edit, where you were not "Fixing style/layout errors". You removed a tag.

I also reverted this edit which was not a "Spelling/grammar/punctuation/typographical correction". Can you explain why you did that? - DVdm (talk) 12:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to New York City Subway. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 11:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please answer the question I asked yesterday? What did you have in mind when you made this edit? - DVdm (talk) 11:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sadomasochism, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 14:43, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Inclined elevator and this edit to 8 (New York City Subway service). DVdm (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Dear Hamimh2,

Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia.

Could you please officially close the two RfCs below that have the same purpose: to decide on a new Trump profile picture?

1. RfC: Trump infobox photo 2. RfC: Trump photo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2024_United_States_presidential_election#Alternative_options%3F Goodtiming8871 (talk) 11:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]