User talk:Havenzeye

Welcome!

Hello, Havenzeye, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 10:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kingdom of Aksum, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 21:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm MaterialWorks. I noticed that in this edit to Aksumite invasion of Himyar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MaterialWorks _(talk) 18:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Teammm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of the Dindar River have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -Teammm ^talk? 19:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conquest of Damot (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conquest of Damot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Havenzeye! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conquest of Damot (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikieditor019 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conquest of Damot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikieditor019 (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of largest empires. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. TompaDompa (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Zara Yaqob, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't insert new information in front of an existing citation that doesn't support it. The source mentions the Sheikh Hanafi Mosque but not in this context (only that it's 500 years old & in Massawa). If another source corroborates your statement, then please properly cite it. Gyrofrog (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al Nejashi Mosque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amda Seyon I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enderta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Lone-078. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kerma culture, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lone-078 (talk) 15:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:BasedHistorian PHD per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BasedHistorian PHD. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Havenzeye (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think that a misunderstanding has occurred for me (Havenzeye) to be blocked as a "sockpuppet" since I genuinely have never heard of "BasedHistorian PHD" who I apparently am a sockpuppet to and have zero idea that this situation has been occurring at all. I am simply a user who is interested in history, more specifically Ethiopian history and would like to make a change in a section of Wikipedia not very well put together in my opinion. Maybe my proactiveness in this section of the wiki may have led to a connection between my edits and edits by other sockpuppet accounts but I can assure you I have nothing to do with this at all.

Havenzeye (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Havenzeye (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken another look at the CU data. In retrospect, my calling it Likely was probably an overstatement. The similarities are mostly geolocations to the same country, but a country where geolocations are known to be problematic. Whoever reviews this should treat the CU data as Possible and consider the obligation to consult with a CU before unblocking to have been discharged. RoySmith (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is there then a possibility of me getting unblocked? Havenzeye (talk) 16:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I had some conversations off-wiki with @Barkeep49 and we jointly came to the conclusion that my original evaluation of the checkuser data was incorrect. I see that you've already been unblocked (despite the message above declining your request!) so I'll just ask that you please accept my apologies for the inconvenience. RoySmith (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ottoman conquest of Habesh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You know very well that it wasn't an Ethiopian victory, stop disrupting that page and provide sources. محرر البوق (talk) 18:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was an Ethiopian victory in the sense that the Ottomans would not be able to conquer Abyssinia and how after Ozdemir Pasha died, their conquests would mostly be reversed Havenzeye (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Conquest of Damot

Hello, Havenzeye. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Conquest of Damot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Austro-Turkish War (1716–1718), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Conquest of Damot

Hello, Havenzeye. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Conquest of Damot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]