User talk:Hee Leong

Concern regarding Draft:Ling Hee Leong

Hello, Hee Leong. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ling Hee Leong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith edit

Hello Hee Leong. I'm informing you that I reverted a good faith edit of yours. I'd like to see a source about the claim by the American magazine. If you need any help or have any questions, feel free to drop a message on my talk page. Best regards. StephenMacky1 (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Hee Leong! Your additions to Najib Razak have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To re-emphasize this, Hee Leong please gain consensus for strong wording that may be against WP:NPOV. - Fuzheado | Talk 14:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Najib Razak controversies

The article Najib Razak controversies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Consensus was not reached before this was arbitrarily and unnecessarily split off from Najib Razak and it may violate WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Edits on Najib Razak

Hi @Hee Leong: thanks for your time taken editing the Najib Razak article. However, on Wikipedia it is really important you describe your edits on the edit summary, so that people know what you are doing. Also, if you are making big, major edits to important articles, you must discuss it with other editors on the Talk page. Wikipedia works by WP:CONSENSUS, so if you make big edits without discussing it first, you may find others might revert or change your edits first. I have tried to bring you to the talk page on the Najib article but you don't appear to have responded. It would be great if we could discuss any changes there. I hope that makes sense. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Najib Razak controversies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Najib Razak controversies, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Najib Razak controversies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Arcahaeoindris (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm DIYeditor. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of reportedly haunted locations without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —DIYeditor (talk) 12:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Mahathir Mohamad false news

Hello, Hee Leong. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Mahathir Mohamad false news, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]