User talk:HelenAtkinson2002

Fifth five-year plan (China) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fifth five-year plan (China). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and At least 4 of the current 5 sources are not independent. Two sources are gov.cn, one is a site which was set up by the Chinese military (see https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2017-11/19/content_34732486.htm) and another describes itself as "Beijing Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China Frontline Magazine". . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TarnishedPath^talk 02:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fifth five-year plan (China) (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fifth five-year plan (China) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HelenAtkinson2002! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fourth five-year plan (China)

Hello, HelenAtkinson2002,

Thank you for creating Fourth five-year plan (China).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for your article Helen. Your article can be improved by adding more independent sources. At present 3 of the 5 sources in the article are not independent (2 gov.cn and chinado.cn).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TarnishedPath}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TarnishedPath^talk 05:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TarnishedPath:Thanks for your comment, I had added more references hours ago. May I ask you how I can improve this article further?--HelenAtkinson2002 (talk) 14:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If possible I would replace the gov.cn and chinado.cn sources with other references. Sources which are independent from the subject are always preferable. Sources which are connected to the subject can be used but preferably only for statements of fact about the most uncontentious material possible. E.g., who was the person in charge, etc.

Beyond that I would try and write it less like an essay. We need to present articles in a neutrally worded manner. Not weave some sort of narrative. TarnishedPath^talk 14:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TarnishedPath:Thanks for your suggestions, and I just removed the chinado before, and the content of gov.cn is only used to state the goals of the five-year plan. Other parts have been used from third-party sources. I will add more third-party sources if nessessary. As for "essay"... maybe I have to try a little more to fix it, I just wanna write the article more rigorous. Again, thanks a lot.--HelenAtkinson2002 (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fifth five-year plan (China) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fifth five-year plan (China). Thanks! Ratekreel (talk) 10:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fifth five-year plan (China) has been accepted

Fifth five-year plan (China), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citing Chinese or English sources at Wikipedia

Helen, you asked a follow-up question at the Wikipedia Help desk to which I responded in some detail, but this discussion was quickly archived, likely too quickly for you to have seen my second response. You can still view it on the archive page, Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2024 October 30. Hope that helps you with your architecture and other articles. Mathglot (talk) 04:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]