User talk:Huy Victory

Welcome!

Hello, Huy Victory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

DO NOT add flags to the inventory tables as you have been doing. This goes against WP:MOSFLAG police - Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

DO NOT continue adding flagcons to the inventory tables as done on serval articles. You are expected avoid editing disruptively, If you continue you may be blocked from editing. FOX 52 (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Bahraini Air Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Huy Victory. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in infobox

Hello. You are adding flags to infobox of weapons. Please read WP:INFOBOXFLAG: Avoid flag icons in infoboxes. I wish you a good continuation for your other edits on Wikipedia.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 17:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air Force of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fighter, Attack and Liaison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid flags in infobox weapon

You are still adding flags to infobox weapon. Please avoid this, per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG about infobox weapon: "The documentation of a number of common infoboxes (e.g., Template:Infobox company, Template:Infobox film, Template:Infobox person, Template:Infobox football biography, Template:Infobox weapon) has long explicitly deprecated the use of flag icons. "--Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your addition of flags in infobox. The thread is User who's edits are only adding flags. Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clear final warning

The next time you make an edit that violates MOS:FLAG you will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning on this matter. Canterbury Tail talk 21:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail: See these three edits: Special:Diff/906084032, Special:Diff/906083901 and Special:Diff/906082974.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been blocked for 24 hours for ignoring the warning and continued deliberate disruptive editing. You are welcome to return after the block expires, however since this behaviour has been ongoing for some time this is your only temporary block. If you continue to make disruptive edits in violation regarding flags again you will be blocked indefinitely as it’ll be clear you’re not here to build an encyclopedia. Again this is your only temporary block and your absolute final warning. Canterbury Tail talk 19:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail: Special:Diff/906502163 a new one. I'm sorry for you Huy Victory, because it seems that you are in good faith but you did not care about our multiple warnings.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You were clearly warned, in unambiguous terms and with no room for misinterpretation, yet you still choose to continue your pattern of disruptive editing. As a result it is very clear you are not here to improve the project, and you've left me with no choice but to block you indefinitely. Canterbury Tail talk 11:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]