User talk:HypeBoy


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #128

FAC peer reviews list

Articles seeking peer review
before featured article candidacy

May 30 Chinese characters
June 6 Jenna Ortega
July 29 Beebo the God of War
August 2 Dexter's Laboratory
August 15 1939 Liechtenstein putsch
August 23 River
August 26 Tropical Storm Kai-tak
August 29 Ivan the Terrible (1945 film)
September 3 A Space for the Unbound
September 17 Lock's Quest
September 27 Pearl (X)
September 28 Tesla Model S
September 30 Lake Michigan Monster
October 4 Cisnormativity
October 16 Veiqia
October 19 Virtual Self (EP)
October 21 Crohn's Disease
October 22 Stingless bee
October 23 Austin J. Tobin Plaza
October 29 William D. Hoard
October 29 Andrea Navagero
October 30 Mind
November 3 Bejeweled (video game)
November 5 James Scott (boxer)
November 11 Gerald Durrell
November 11 Snooze (song)

Unanswered peer reviews

This user finds your edit summary: not guilty!

	Some post-trial confetti for you!
	Saw your edit summary for Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney. Good job attributing the text to the Ace Attorney article! That was the right thing to do. If you'd like to investigate more, please feel free to head over to Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Cheers, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Hi, In reply to your question: Kindly explain why Miss USA 2023 and similar articles use this style of short description, then. The majority of pageant articles in my experience don't follow the manual of style, are poorly written, and have little notability, and lack sources. Poorly written short descriptions are the norm, and as a result are truncated on mobile platforms. Note that comparing a practice with other pages that have the same practice WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not justification for continuing to do it against MOS. Hope that helps. Sciencefish (talk) 08:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sciencefish: I'm afraid I have to disagree a bit because A) Miss USA articles that I mentioned do not have the problems that you listed, you can tell just by actually reading the articles (e.g. They aren't lacking in sources) and B) Per WP:SDAVOID, There is no objection to an otherwise-suitable short description that also happens to work as a definition. I changed the short description to distinguish the article further from similar articles (e.g. Miss Universe Indonesia) by emphasizing the pageant's edition. I hope this clears up the confusion. Cheers. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of BL dramas has been accepted

List of BL dramas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism-only account

Are you going to do something about this troll or not? Do you need more insults and personal attacks directed towards me to prove that this guy is WP:NOTHERE? GenoV84 (talk) 22:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help, I appreciate it. GenoV84 (talk) 23:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

DanCherek (talk) 01:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi. I saw that you accepted an unsourced addition to 1996 recently. I have reverted this change, in line with Wikipedia:DOYCITE. All new entries must include an inline citation to back up the date. Deb (talk) 15:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: Noted, thank you. But may I ask why a lot of the entries there don't have an inline citation? I'm still unfamiliar with DOY lists. Best, — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 20:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because this rule came in during 2018 and since then we've been playing catchup. So the ones that are still unreferenced tend to hang around until we have time to do something with them. If you look at the histories of these articles, you'll see a lot of reverted edits resulting from people adding unsourced content that is then removed by someone else. However, a few of the Year and Date articles are now in good shape because of editors who've done a lot of work adding references and removing entries that can't be verified. Please do feel free to join in the effort. :-) Deb (talk) 08:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: Will keep that in mind! Thank you for explaining, and cheers. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 08:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RIIZE edit

I literally added a citation to the edit I made the article I made for RIIZE that you notified me about. Noahbecksleftab (talk) 16:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You mean this article? This article doesn't have any mention about the "boycott" and "bullying" you wrote in your edit. All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable by reliable source(s) that directly support the claim. Please familiarize yourself with WP:PROOF because it's one of the three core content policies in Wikipedia. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was "Itts"

I don't know how someone changed "Itts" to "NQCC", and the reversion of my edit. It was my request, not other IP's. 88.235.228.63 (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I assumed it wasn't you since your IP doesn't match the requester. Your edit have been restored. Cheers. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 19:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie's name in the lead

Hi. Saw the hidden comment but still, this is her stage name so saying stylized in all caps is more precise to inform the reader that this is not the general case and it's just for stylization reasons. 62.74.24.239 (talk) 03:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I rejected your pending edit on Sophie (musician) because your edit did exactly what the hidden note says not to do. I suggest you go to the article's talk page and discuss it to seek WP:CONSENSUS with interested editors there. Best, — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 04:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but I explained above why I did it. It's purely a stylization. See for instance Enisa Nikaj and Tayanna articles, it's exactly the same. 62.74.24.239 (talk) 05:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, that's why I suggested the article's talk page, so you can explain exactly that to the editors there, and hopefully also to the editor who left the note. If I accept your edit despite the note, other editors likely will revert your edit back. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 05:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is editors rarely to never participate to tp discussions if the subject is not famous at a certain period; Sophie has been deceased for almost four years now so I highly doubt anyone would participate anytime soon. 62.74.24.239 (talk) 05:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It never hurts to try. I suggest you make a Wikipedia account so you'll get notified when someone responds to your talk page message. Also, it's better to have an account if you want to edit Wikipedia in the long term. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 06:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]