User talk:IamMusa

Welcome!

Hello, IamMusa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 02:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IamMusa, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! IamMusa, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IamMusa, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm Yunshui, your Co-op mentor. Looking at the work you've done so far, I see that you've already got the hang of basic Wikipedia editing, which is great. There are a couple of important policies that you need to know about, though, before you go any further.

First and foremost, Wikipedia doesn't accept just anything as a source. Sources which you cite on Wikipedia need to be reliable - that is to say, they must be derived from a respected, editorially-oversighted publication. That means blogs, Youtube videos, Facebook pages and personal websites are out - basically, you can't use these as sources. Suitable sources are things like newspaper articles (although tabloids are frowned upon), books and reputable news or current affairs websites - you've used some of these in your articles, which is excellent.

Secondly, you cannot copy text from your sources. Some of the wording of your entries is extremely close to that of the sources you've used - you need to go back and make sure that all the content is entirely in your own words, not copied or even paraphrased from the original. This is really important, as it has real-world legal implications. This also applies to images - you've uploaded several images claiming that you own the copyright, but at least two of these seem to have been drawn from copyrighted sources elsewhere on the web. If you did not take the photograph, you do not own the copyright, and you absolutely cannot release the image on Wikipedia under a free licence - again, this is against the law.

Generally speaking, you've done an excellent job - the subjects you've chosen appear to be notable enough to have articles, you've used WikiMarkup correctly to create sections and reference lists, and you've even managed to create infoboxes. The copyright issues are a real concern though; you are likely to be blocked from editing if that sort of problem continues. My advice to you for your next session on Wikipedia is as follows:

Check the images you have uploaded (here) and be honest about whether you do in fact own the copyright on them. If you do not - if you didn't take those pictures yourself - click on the image title to go to the Commons page for that picture, click on "Nominate for deletion" in the right hand menu (under "Tools") and fill in a rationale along the lines of "Non-free file, deletion requested by uploaded".
Look through the articles you've created and rewrite any passages that are close to the original source.
Go through the sources in your articles and remove any that do not meet the reliable sources criteria.

Let me know if you need any help. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Zaid AliT, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 12:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haji Springer (rapper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haji Springer (rapper), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 11:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Not Socket Pup or Any Such Thing Thats not I'm being Blocked but i had not voilated of any of the rights of wikipedia thats not good its not fair i should be unblocked now. I had not made any voilation thatlen i don't know why i am blocked. :(

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that you are User:Mnaqvii; the evidence, both behavioural and technical, is overwhelming. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh! This makes me Crazy
I Have Deactivated all of my accounts now what should i do.?? That's really not fair!! I'm only using this account and i am not making any voilation. Now tell me what should i do? Should i quit wikipedia? That it not good at all i'm being disturbed.

If you want to be unblocked, you will need to log in to your original account and file an unblock request. However, given your history of persistent sockpuppetry, such a request is likely to be declined in the first instance. I would recommend that you take the standard offer: leave Wikipedia for six months (no sockpuppetry or logged-out editing) and then post an unblock appeal from your original account. That way at least you're likely to get a hearing. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Articles i Created few days before can i create them again after this account IamMusa is unblocked because those articles do not meet criteria of deletion

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IamMusa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I was Blocked I quit Wikipedia now I have joined it again with this account and i am blocked again. I am not using any other account. All of my accounts are inactive for months i just want to use this account I have created after 2 months. I request you to remove all of my accounts except because i can't deactivate wiki account like facebook and Twitter. IamMusa (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Before we go any further, I want you to provide a complete list of accounts you have created. PhilKnight (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked :(

PhilKnight These are the accounts

And This one created after 2 months.
PhilKnight I request you to permanently remove all the above accounts.