User talk:Jarnsax
Jarnsax, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Jarnsax! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC) |
Notes
[edit]Hi Jarnsax. I am not an expert on sourcing, but I get the feeling the way you are trying to clean the mess in Anarchism will result in two huge section (Notes and References). Why don't u use {{r|noteABC}} and then insert at the ref section {{reflist|refs=
<ref name=ABC>blah blah{{harvnb|Authorname|2019|p=xx}}
</ref>
}}
What do you say? I am not an expert in citation styles, so this edit is more like a question on what are the benefits of your method. Thanks. Cinadon36 (talk) 11:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Cinadon36: It's mainly that I'm just messing with getting the huge chunks of text out of the way first, to make it more managable. A lot of those sources are probably repeated, and not worth moving around more than once if they will be combined. Jarnsax (talk) 11:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Cinadon36: Glancing at this again later.... you are correct that what I'm doing will still result in a very large notes section, as well as the references. That is not, IMO, a bad thing.... the textual notes in a work are conceptually different from the references, and separating them is useful to the reader. It also allows (a benefit of using harvard references) the actual 'references' section to consist of shorter sections of text, so be folded into smaller columns and use less visual space. Another benefit of separating the textual notes from the references is that, in print versions of the encyclopedia, the notes can be placed at the bottom of the relevant pages while the references are at the end, as in a traditional book.
- Another advantage of using a separate notes section is that it allows (by including references in the notes) for further folding of citations, always a good thing.
- I'm not, very intentionally, changing the actual content at all... there is much obvious crap in the sourcing here, but that's a different type of editing from the cleanup I'm doing, and it's better to not cloud the purpose of the edits.... also, lol, I have not even read the article. This just popped out as one that needed it badly. Jarnsax (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
|
The Cleanup Barnstar |
| Thank you for your clean-up of the massive mess of the footnotes at Anarchism. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
- @Malik Shabazz: Thanks... they were terrible. I'm not done yet, intend to finish converting them all to LDR (the wikitext was unreadable) and then fold as many as possible together... I have, as you would expect, found many repeated references that could be folded using {{sfn}} with page numbers. Hopefully, it will make it easier for the actual content people to improve this.... I'm not changing the article itself at all, but there are some really crap sources.
- It's also my intent to fix the actual references themselves... look them up, and then properly cite them. Things like a half-dozen references to different copies of different versions of the Anarchist's FAQ, including links to archived dead urls, are ridiculous. Someone has to do some line editing occasionally. Jarnsax (talk) 05:11, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Anarchism
[edit]
Hi Jarnsax,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 13:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)