User talk:Jithinsamgeorge

File copyright problem with File:Malankara division.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Malankara division.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jithinsamgeorge. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Smallman12q (talk) 01:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you alive????

Need to talk to you ... :-). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fyodor7 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, Jithinsamgeorge, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Tommcgowan (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 11:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cabayi (talk · contribs) you must check my editing patterns and contribution history before assuming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jithinsamgeorge (talk • contribs) 12:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jithinsamgeorge, I'm making no assumptions, I spotted a strange mix of edits which raised questions in my mind.

Tommcgowan created the EPROMIS article -

09:24, 16 July 2018 (diff | hist) . . (+2,007) . . N EPROMIS (←Created page with 'Lowercase ePROMIS Solutions Inc. is an American multinational ERP software company with headquarters in Houston|Hou...')

As your second edit after an 18 month hiatus you added the new article to the list -

09:58, 16 July 2018 (diff | hist) . . (+51) . . m List of ERP software packages (→Proprietary ERP vendors and software: added proprietary ERP software provider ePROMIS to the list.) (current) [rollback: 1 edit] (Tag: 2017 wikitext editor) [rollback] [vandalism]

which Tommcgowan then cites at 10:42 as making the company notable.

This edit pattern could be entirely legitimate, or it could be an indicator of sockpuppetry, or an indicator of astroturfing. I'm just asking the question. Cabayi (talk) 15:41, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi (talk · contribs), I have only 1 wiki English account, I'm into wikipedia community since 2009 and I am not a sock puppet. So please don't make assumptions based on coincidences and random events. Hope you got my point! Jithinsamgeorge (talk) 09:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]