User talk:Johnyjohny294

From Johnyjohny294,deleted old and viewed messages

I was attacked by hackers and my account had been phished,therefore my pages were slow ,tools were not loading ,nothing was working,only ip addresses were viewed.so i had to delete old messages to easily locate new messages as things were difficult for me until it was somewhat resolved.--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 16:30, 15 September 201(UTC)[reply]

No you weren't. Wikipedia's servers are having trouble today and everybody is having problems, including me. Bgwhite (talk) 18:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnyjohny294 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I should not be blocked because my account is confirmed through my email address .my email address is confirmed to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. What is your connection to User:Christianjoseph89? Kinu ^t/_c 05:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

−

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnyjohny294 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i dont know any sockpuppet or sockpuppet suspicion accounts or chrisanjoseph who is he?? −

I should not be blocked because my email address was added to this account and had been confirmed through a wikipedia link.

−

this ip is my registered ip.

−

other accounts should not be allowed in this ip and they should not be allowed to act like my sockpuppet.I dont know why this happened.I feel like some user is targeting phishing of my account and and these sockpuppets and sockpuppet reason looks very strange.

−

Block those strange accounts ,not my registered account johnyjohny294.

−

I don t know who those sockpuppets are.My account is already phished and my pc was at the risk of hacking.

Decline reason:

Right. Your PC has been hacked by someone who created User:Payansarun, User:Coolram and User:Christianjoseph89, all of whom created and/or edited the same articles as you. I don't think this is true. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnyjohny294 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request unblock because i dont know the other accounts using my ip.It could be a coinincidence or may be a trick to put me into a block by contributing to same article using my ip. I never got any warning.It was said that wikipedia users have a decent policy,,,,Warning the users (about existance of such persons or accounts using my ip}before blocking them.request unblock ticket takes lots of hours and looks like a waste of time,I completely reject any relation with any accounts u mentioned ... if there is any accounts working using my ip,deactivate them permanently or warn them.why my account is blocked .This ip is already registered to my email address and the email is verified by confirmation.... how is this sockpuppet issue arise?the user account johnyjohny294 has an email id tagged to the account and it is already considered as my account ie johnys account.So solution is simple Block the other accounts and unblock mine. Infact gogo dodo is wasting my time making me keeping on appealing to administrators,the time which would have been used for editing ,contributing to and creating articles . After saying this much,if u are not convinced,tell me what u want me to do to get my account unblocked.I would like to know what you will suggest.I cannot keep on appealing appealing ,for infinite years for what purpose i am appealing becomes a fruitless question.some people think that it is joke.I think that you wont do that and wont make me appeal for ever .Make a permanent decision and warn or message me and unblock me.

Decline reason:

It depresses me when you claim to have been 'hacked.' Only a very stupid person would believe this story, since technical evidence, editing history, and even your writing style makes it very obvious that you are operating all of these accounts. That you tried telling this lie indicates that you think I am stupid enough to believe it, and that hurts my feelings. Since sockpuppeting and lying about it are both dishonest, it isn't likely that anyone will believe you if you promise now to stop breaking the rules- it's therefore very unlikely that you will be unblocked. Sometimes, a compassionate admin will unblock a person in your position if you (1) Take a long break from Wikipedia - at least a month for each account you have used (2) Request unblock from your original account (3) In your request, list all the accounts you have created, even accounts that haven't been caught yet, and (4) state a clear plan for editing that will result in a better encyclopedia with no more disruption. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: This is a checkuser verified sockpuppet of those other accounts; it's quite unambiguous. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)It is very clear that user jp gordon is keeping silent without answering to my comments below.It looks like He is only determined to block my account.--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why blocking me gordon,things are more than confirmed.If not why an email id confirmation or do you think it is a joke or useless procedure to confirm email id . if there is one id confirmed and other suspicious malicious hacker accounts are functioning in the confirmed ip,it is easily tracked by the above procedure isnt it ,you can warn or block the hacker accounts (suspected as sockpuppet by wikipedia) if u want ,but not the email id confirmed user account..--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And take a final decision and completetely deactivate other user accounts which is necessary to Make sure that i am not blocked again connecting me to those accounts.I am saying this with required seriousness.Please dont take it as a joke.It is a request.--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 19:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is very clear that user jp gordon is keeping silent without answering to my comments.It looks like He is only determined to block my account.--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I am blocked by user Gogo Dodo.

I had given request unblock ticket.

It is taking hours and hours.Still no action.--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 12:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) OK, I will pass on the message, but frankly I don't think there's a "snow chance" that you will be un-blocked. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Action has occurred. You requested an unblock, but your request didn't have anything to do with your reason for blocking. Frankly, I'm not convinced that you are a sockpuppet, or that you even know what a sockpuppet is. However, I don't see any evidence of any useful contributions to this project, and a lot of evidence of harm.

The next step is yours. You need to persuade someone that you are not a sockpuppet. You might start by reading Wikipedia:Sock puppetry, so you know the reason for the block.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 12:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

People forget to warn, i think first step before blocking is warning the User.

I didn't know that there were other accounts operating using my ip (wrongly suspected to be my sockpuppet) simultaneously when i was doing my work on wikipedia.

gogo dodo should have warned me about these kind of a suspicion befor blocking......

I dont know whether you are aware that cyberspace is full of hackers and phishing professionals from the day it was formed.I don't have any doubt that it is them. who here is actually talk page stalker shirt was referring too,is it shirt himself or user --Johnyjohny294 (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)....???--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unblock ticket is taking 1000s 0f minutes..... i am appealing for an unblock..--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't taking 1000s of minutes. You've received more attention that you deserve. There are no open requests. I suggest you take a month off, and think about whether you want to contribute positively or not.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 21:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 08:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Tea Leaf - Issue Seven

Hello again! We have some neat updates about the Teahouse:

We’ve added badges! Teahouse awards is a pilot project to learn how acknowledgement impacts engagement and retention in Teahouse and Wikipedia.

We’ve got a new WikiLove Badge script that makes giving badges quick and easy. Add it here. You can give out badges to thank helpful hosts, welcome guests, acknowledge great questions and more.

Come join the experiment and let us know what you think!

And...for all of your great work and all of the progress that you've helped the Teahouse make, we hereby award you the Host Badge:

Teahouse Host Badge

Awarded to hosts at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Experienced editors with this badge have committed to welcoming guests, helping new editors, and upholding the standards of the Teahouse by giving friendly and patient guidance—at least for a time.

Hosts illuminate the path for new Wikipedians, like Tōrō in a Teahouse garden.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here

Thanks again! Ocaasi 01:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]