User talk:Jordy Vaca

Lisat of the busiest airports in Ecuador

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lisat of the busiest airports in Ecuador, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of the busiest airports in South America. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 16:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of the busiest airports in Ecuador

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of the busiest airports in Ecuador, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Lisat of the busiest airports in Ecuador. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Avianca does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! JetBlast (talk) 18:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wingtipvortex. This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Avianca Ecuador without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 22:50, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Avianca Ecuador, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 22:52, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mariscal Sucre International Airport and Ministro Pistarini International Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! Furthermore, full dates are required in both airport and airline destination articles for new routes. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, --Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ecuador airlines destinations

Template:Ecuador airlines destinations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mariscal Sucre International Airport (New), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ministro Pistarini International Airport, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:19, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of the destinations of Mariscal Sucre International Airport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the destinations of Mariscal Sucre International Airport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the destinations of Mariscal Sucre International Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ministro Pistarini International Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ministro Pistarini International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Given that you keep adding unsourced content despite being warned not to do so, I have reported you at WP:AIV.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeatedly adding un-verifiable and/or unsourced information. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 23:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent activity

I have reverted your edits at Aerolíneas Argentinas destinations on the basis of poor sourcing. Read WP:SPS for further details. Moreover, I have reported you again at WP:AIV for adding unsourced content at Ministro Pistarini International Airport. You've been recently blocked for doing that, yet you keep disregarding WP:VERIFY.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated entry of unsourced material. Blogs are not reliable sources as you have been already informed. Maybe you should re-read WP:RS or when in doubt, ask in the article's talk page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 18:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable versus non-reliable sources

You do not seem to understand the difference between a blog and a reliable source. This time, you introduced a blog as a reference in this edit, which was later reverted by an administrator. I initially reported you a WP:AIV, but following the intervention of the administrator into the article, I changed my mind, or otherwise you'd probably get a new block. In my opinion, it's more productive for you to understand what a reliable source means, so I strongly suggest you to read WP:RELIABLE very carefully. You've been blocked twice for adding unsourced or poorly sourced content into articles, so please take my word of advice to avoid a third block. You may contact me at my talk page if you need any assistance.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reported again

You keep ignoring my notes, especially the one right above this thread, and continued the addition of unsourced stuff into articles ([1], [2]). I have reported you again at WP:AIV.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 00:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unsourced content

You don't understand, do you? I have reverted most of your recent edits at Mariscal Sucre International Airport because you did not provide sources for the claims included on them. It seems you do not want to accept the fact that WP:VERIFY is a policy. I've reported you again at WP:AIV. Are you reading the threads above and why you've been blocked for?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. You need to engage with other editors to discuss their issues with your editing, rather than pushing forward with what you think is right.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Avianca Ecuador destinations

The article Avianca Ecuador destinations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This unreferenced article is original research. The underlying article Avianca Ecuador points to the Avianca website, which makes no differentiation between Avianca and Avianca Ecuador services. Avianca Ecuador is a wholly owned subsidiary and operates as a single airline with its parent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citibank Ecuador listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Citibank Ecuador. Since you had some involvement with the Citibank Ecuador redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]