User talk:Kellyunderwood

Welcome!

Hello Kellyunderwood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alai 16:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nury Vittachi

Moved Vittachi to Nury Vittachi. Actually, 100% certainly seems like a consensus to me. :) In cases as straightforward as this, a listing at Wikipedia:Requested moves isn't really necessary anyway: any logged-in user can move an "obviously" wrongly titled article, provided there's no clash at the move target. Alai 16:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I'd forgotten about that restriction! It's not really designed to stop "newbies" as such, but is a recent measure to try to thwart a certain notorious page-move vandal. Keep making those vital spelling corrections, and you'll be "in good standing" in no time, and able to make all the moves ypu like. :) Alai 04:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zabriskie picture

The thing is, Frank Steele is already attributed - as is his right of course - in the Image:David zabriskie portrait.jpg page. I have no real qualms about it, it was just a reflex deletion as it looked like selfpromotion. So this seems like a good compromise :) Poulsen 13:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart O'Grady Photo

I NEVER gave my permission for my copyrighted photo of Stuart O'Grady to be used. I only rececived an email telling me that you were using my photo. Sorry, but I am not giving you permission to use any of my photos, ever. Do not repost my photo. Do not use any of my photos, period. - Alden Tanaka

Kelly says: He probably shouldn't have used the Creative Commons license on his photos then. Fixed! Quite a pity really, because it is a great photo.

Supreme Court image

If you are really the copyright holder, then please change the license of the image at the source (Flickr), such that it is compatible with WP license (BY or SA). The source of the file is still not compatible. It is now CC-BY-ND-2.0. If you don't change this license at the source, then I have to revert back your image license to the same license as the source. — Indon (reply) — 02:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSC/Puerto

I just think you forgot to close the ref again, with a </ref> tag, and the ref didn't stop until the next </ref> tag, at Cuesta's ref. I think the Puerto article is a little messy, some subsections might be a good thing, plus it has refs in that one section header, which should be cleaned. Poulsen 11:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good! I tried reading through a few refs but couldn't find the exact facts needed myself. Poulsen 13:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lotto et al

I've been doing research, which is quite difficult due to the lack of English language sources, but I have been using the websites Cycling4all and Cyclingnews, to try to trace them back. Cycling4all is very good, but I don't think it qualifies as a reliable source so haven't referenced it. Anyway, as I understand, Lotto-Domo was a new team in 2002, mainly built upon Lotto-Adecco, and using a lot of Domo-Farm Frites staff and riders too. I think because they were different teams they deserve their own articles. I think we need a wider debate on when teams qualify for new articles - I'll start one at the Project talk page... Mk3severo 00:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the infobox on the Robbie McEwen page to the new one - slight change of picture order, please do revert the pictures if you feel it's better. I also started a discussion on how team pages should look here. Mk3severo 01:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: I-Team; Kenny Hickey; Brian Vandborg; Top Gear (magazine); Andy Schleck; Team Fakta; BodyRockers; Mark Hensby; Challenge Stadium; Kasper Klostergaard; Martin Pedersen (cyclist); Française des Jeux; Bernard Fanning; Home a/s; Domina Vacanze; Didi Senft; Lars Michaelsen; Johnny Kelly

Cleanup: Roger Mudd; World championship tour (WCT) surfing; The Furor

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UCI press releases

UCI press releases always seem to be final - until two weeks later when a new final one is issued ;) Remember during the summer/autumn that the UCI said that Active Bay would have a ProTour licence and that Astana had no chance after missing a deadline? I think we'll just have to see when it all shakes out! Mk3severo 12:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The news sites say that Fuerteventura-Canarias (which is based on the set-up of the old Communitat Valenciana team), Aurum Hotels (which used to be Naturino-Sapore Di Mare) and Team L.P.R. (or whatever it will be called having merged with Team 3C Casalinghi Jet Androni Giocattoli, the team of Davide Boifava) applied for licences but did not receive them (they only speculated why, there isn't a strict limit on the number of ProConti teams). Also I'm confused with what has happened to the Miche team - they seem to have just disappeared as none of the news sites have anything about them and they don't have a licence! The only thing I can think of is that they have something to do with the Tinkoff Credit Systems team... Very strange Mk3severo 02:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Team CSC

I don't think it was a good idea to remove all the individual references to riders entering or extending their contracts, they contained additional information (such as what the riders and teams expectation were) that might be of interest the reader.--Per Abrahamsen 11:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effingham

I think you removed the stuff from this page and put it elsewhere. I'm just not sure if maybe there needs to be a link on the page directing the reader to it. I couldn't see one. I may quite well have missed it and admit I wasn't up to wading through all the talk page. SuzanneKn 21:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saul Raisin

I can explain it in one word - mistake. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll remove that tag right now. Regards, --Roswell native 15:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Jean shrimpton.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jean shrimpton.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

I'm pretty sure NNDB doesn't actually own that photo, so we don't actually have the original source or copyright holder. Kelvinc 02:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Shrimpton

Thanks. I think that the Bazzar's cover would work well, and I defer to your greater knowledge on the subject for this one. Officially magazine covers aren't fair use for just depicting the subject, but since this one is obviously quite well-recognized, it's good for the article and the facial recognition would be an added perk. ;)

Yah Wikipedia's been a lot more stringent on copyrights now than it has before, and after going through the process of securing the release of the photo currently at Yésica Toscanini, I appreciated a whole lot more the difficulty of the process. So I started to rummage through other articles on models to see how many people took the easy way out and just slapped on a "fair use" sticker on copyrighted photos. I thank you for your friendly and helpful attitude: it's a lot better than the occasion where my {{fair use disputed}} of an image and removal of said image from an article were just reverted by the uploader. Kelvinc 23:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Norcia, Western Australia

I'm new to Wikipedia and still learning, hence no explanation about the text I removed from the article yesterday. I removed the "Abbey" section as it was verbatim the text from the Old Catholic Encyclopedia, the link for which already appeared in the article. I thought the link was sufficient, with no need for the text to appear as well. Rjw9459 12:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

Please note that in order to have an image speedy deleted at Commons you must place the speedy deletion template on the Commons image page, not the one here. Wikipedia admins aren't necessarily admins there (I'm not) and can't delete images there. See Commons:Commons:Deletion guidelines#Speedy deletion for more information. Thanks. Chick Bowen 04:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008 UCI ProTeams

I done a bit of work on this at the 2008 UCI ProTour page yesterday actually. There seems to be a few minor changes, Ag2r are changing the sub-sponsor, Saunier Duval seems to be dropping Prodir as a sponsor. Also, who knows, maybe High Road will have a sponsor before the year is out? Unibet seem to have dropped out, their licence is being withdrawn. This is the link for everything, but we'll have to wait another month for everything to be official! Severo^TC 10:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My rename request

Hi Kelly, i answered on my Discussion on dewikinews. Thank you very much for willing to change your username. -- Kju (talk) 12:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: The renames did take place. You might now want to unify your own account, see Special:MergeAccount. I would recommend doing that to prevent you as this prevents you from having the same problem as me in the future (although this is unlikely with your unique username). -- Kju (talk) 15:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC) PS: Thanks again.[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kellyunderwood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kellyunderwood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Wood (biathlete)

Hi. When adding the date of death of someone, you need to supply a reliable source to verify this. Do you have a source that states the date of death for this person? Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC) - Hi Lugnuts - unfortunately I only have posts on his Facebook profile page which wouldn't be visible to the general public. kju (talk) 08:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]