User talk:KelseyAlexandro

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to David Duke, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: David Duke was changed by KelseyAlexandro (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938793 on 2011-01-25T03:59:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to David Duke constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 04:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to David Duke. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Marek.69 ^talk 04:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to David Duke. Pparazorback (talk) 04:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was not committing vandalism. I was inserting the truth.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KelseyAlexandro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not committing vandalism. I was inserting the truth.

Decline reason:

No, it was vandalism. Step hen 04:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.