User talk:Lekaralius

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --WikiAviator (talk) 13:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding vandalism of WikiAviator (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)'s talk page

Please do not undo revisions of people's talk pages. This is considered as vandalism. Thank you. WikiAviator (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned in Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

You are mentioned in Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism due to vandalism of WikiAviator's talk page. WikiAviator (talk) 14:48, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello Lekaralius. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lekaralius. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lekaralius|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yunshui. I do not have any undisclosed financial stake in promoting any topic. I study Business Management, so I have an interest in the biggest Lithuanian companies and their operations. If I find that company has old-dated or incorrect information in their Wikipedia page, I always try to correct it, because I care about Lithuanian companies. I have never done it for any compensation. Also, my edits usually are related to small corrections and do not include structural changes. Lekaralius (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, can you please elaborate on what you meant by this edit, and the others that you made on the same day? It appears very much as though you are specifically asking other users for assistance in getting content you have written as a freelancer added to Wikipedia. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was a misunderstanding from me. As I am quite new to Wikipedia, I thought that I have to prepare the information using HTML (I do not know how to write this code) and I was searching for experienced Wikipedia users who could help me to do this. Only after a few days I found out that it is possible to make edits through the visual tool. Although I do not always have time to read all the rules and information in Wikipedia, I try to comply with all the terms and conditions. Lekaralius (talk) 10:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:FL Technics LOGO.png

Thanks for uploading File:FL Technics LOGO.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Avia Solutions Group logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avia Solutions Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lekaralius. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lekaralius|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

1292simon (talk) 00:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darius Saluga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darius Saluga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darius Saluga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello Lekaralius. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lekaralius. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lekaralius|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 14:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]