User talk:Lemonade100
Welcome
[edit]
|
English
[edit]NEVER edit other people's comments at talk pages, as you did here [1]. Please revert your edit and do not repeat it.JdeJ (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Sorry but my spell checker corrects the entire spelling of the Area as aposed to just thr bit I wrote.--Lemonade100 (talk) 15:56, 12 January 2009 (GMT)
- Ok, no problem. Please try to turn the spell checker off next time. CheersJdeJ (talk) 17:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
'Unofficial regional anthem'
[edit]Could you explain what you mean by this? Dubmill (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
The Official National Anthem of Gibraltar is God Save The Queen as it is a overseas territory of the United Kingdom. The Gibraltar Anthem is used to represent Gibraltar when it is inappropriate to use God Save the Queen i.e. when represented apart other territories or regions of the UK and the Commonwealth Games --Lemonade100 (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2009 (GMT)
I see what you mean, but I was querying the use of the word 'regional'. This is a geographical term and would therefore include places nearby having no connection to Gibraltar or its anthem, eg Spain or Portugal. I would suggest replacement of the word 'regional' by 'local'. Dubmill (talk) 17:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
It means a region of the United KIngdom and its territories not a region as in part of Iberia. --Lemonade100 (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2009 (GMT)
Should it not be captalised then? ('Regional', not 'regional') Dubmill (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah! Why Not? I will change it. --Lemonade100 (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2009 (GMT)
I note also that on the wikipedia page for Gibraltar that it is described as an 'overseas TERRITORY' of the United Kingdom. Are you sure that 'Region' is correct? Dubmill (talk) 17:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes I am as REGIONAL is also used to describe Anthems of other British TERRITORIES and Crown Dependancies (not including IoM as it has declared God save the Queen as its Royal Anthem and its anthem in now official).
Period or Full Stop
[edit]Hello, Just a note that both terms are correct, and interchangeable. I reworded the French Language text to include both as you seem to prefer Full Stop over the other, and to avoid any miss understandings, but as you can see by the article Full_stop both are accepted. Wikipedia does not make a preference to British, American, Canadian or any particular English variation. --Mrboire (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- I just thought that full stop cannot get mixed up with anything else but there are several things period can be mistook for. Lemonade100 (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- In many ways you are completely correct, it's all about what "version" of English you speak, and that is why I reworded it to include both terminologies, it's a fluid encyclopedia!. (For example: here if you say full stop, they think you are talking about stopping a car at a stop sign!, they do not understand!). Thanks for the discussion. (FYI, place a talkback on my discussion page if you respond so I know! Lots of little things on Wiki!)--Mrboire (talk) 00:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit]
Edit summaries
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. --Jza84 | Talk 21:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to British people, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is also another request that you fill in an edit summary when making changes to articles --Jza84 | Talk 22:06, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
3RR
[edit]
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Mais oui! (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry but you are the one reverting necessary changes.
- Always sign your posts. Take this to the Template Talk page. --Mais oui! (talk) 19:19, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have in many ways yet no-one seems to bother themselves wth commenting Lemonade100 (talk) 19:21, 1 October 2009 (GMT)
Date articles
[edit]Hello. I undid part of your change to an entry on April 26 because it didn't conform to the date page guideline at WP:DAYS. If you have any questions, please ask. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks sorry there was an edit conflict and I tried putting both in sorry if it cause any inconvenience.
Signing posts
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:United Kingdom, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Todmorden
[edit]Re this edit - at the time that the Lancashire League was formed, the Lancs/Yorks county boundary ran through Todmorden, not around the edge; indeed, not many years earlier, it actually ran right through the Town Hall itself. Since the cricket authorities follow traditional counties (Lancashire CCC playing at Old Trafford, and the continued existence of Middlesex CCC both being evidence of that), Todmorden has every right to be a member of Lancashire League. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I never said it didn't have a right and yes they do use the Traditional counties (by the way Todmorden was moved fully in to yorks pre 1970s, in the 1880s, it is still classified as traditionally in Yorks) I was mearly pointing out the novelty of it. I am from Todmorden (and know very well what the old boundry was and has been) and am proud of its status as being one of the only Yorkshire teams in a Lancashire league, and I am guessing by your name "redrose64" that you are a proud Lancastrian. I stand by the edit I made as I thought it was just a nice bit of information that would like to be known. Todmorden has been in Yorkshire well over 100 years now, No-one alive born in todmorden has been norn in Lancashire, so move on if you are really so botherd about such. Thank you for your voice but like I said it was just a nice bit of info - not a slight or complaint.
- - OH and just for your information Todmorden was 100% in Yorks before the league was formed :D
--Lemonade100 16:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Glorious Revolution. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
February 2011
[edit]Your edits to Wales, Scotland and England have been reverted. Please experiment in a sandbox, instead of carrying out test edits on such high profile articles. All edits should be accompanied by an edit summary (to explain to other editors what you are hoping to achieve) and they should be verified by a reliable source. Also, if you are making controvercial edits, it is essential that you achieve consensus on the article's Talkpage first. If you have any questions, please ask. Best, Daicaregos (talk) 17:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
York meetup
[edit]Hi Lemonade100. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from London. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Oak. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argyll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dukedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Tenors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Her Majesty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anguilla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church of God (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Leeds meetup
[edit]Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 22 July
[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the LGBT rights in the United Kingdom page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of countries that have gained independence from the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statute of Westminster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places in England with counterintuitive pronunciations: M–Z, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sowerby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Lemonade100. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Lemonade100. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
National Library of Northern Ireland listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National Library of Northern Ireland. Since you had some involvement with the National Library of Northern Ireland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Addedentry (talk) 22:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
List of cities in the United Kingdom article - cathedral discussion
[edit]Lemonade100 hi there,
Would you like to contribute to a discussion on the above topic. I noticed you have made worthy contributions to it previously and thought you may want to be involved in a best practice consensus on how to proceed with listing cathedrals in the article.
Talk:List of cities in the United Kingdom - Cathedrals discussion
Many thanks for any input.
--The Equalizer (talk) 17:34, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Lemonade100. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)