User talk:Magnus Puer

Tableh

Who	What	Where	When	Why	How
Them	That	There	Then	Because	Science
Them	That	There	Then	Because	Science
Them	??????	There	Then	Because	Science
Them	PROFIT!	There	Then	Because	Science
Them	That	There	Then	YOU MUST CONSTRUCT ADDITIONAL PYLONS	Science
Them	That	There	Then	Because	Science

Boi

I have no idea what I'm doing.

Magnus Puer (sermo) 03:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

If you actually want to say something...

Do it here You know what I will say something. For all of you who don't know much about the language of Latin, "Magnus Puer" translates roughly to "Big Boy." This means that this user, Magnus Puer, claims for himself to be a big boy. This is false, I am the real big boy, and the only big boy on this website. Thank you very much. OG Bic Boi (talk) 12:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)OG Bic BoiOG Bic Boi (talk) 12:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rodrigo García (boxer)  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Magnus Puer. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at Udo Ferschnicten. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Longevism speedy deletion

Hello, Mr. Puer. You nominated my article Longevism for speedy deleted under criterion A10, claiming that it duplicated the article on longevity. I believe that my article distinguished longevism from longevity and included well-sourced information exclusive to my article. To be clear, longevism is the ideology of extending possible lifespan with modern science, rather than longevity itself. Could you elaborate on your decision to remove the article? I would appreciate some advice on how to prevent this from happening in the future. Thank you. --Haptic-feedback (talk) 05:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@Orangemike and Haptic-feedback: Orangemike, I believe the above message was intended for you. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Actually, Magnus did nominate the article for speedy deletion. Mike confirmed the deletion, but I left a separate message for him. --Haptic-feedback (talk) 05:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@Haptic-feedback: That's fine, but just so you know, the person tagging the article for deletion does not make the decision to remove the article that decision is left up to the deleting admin. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@War wizard90: Ah, I see how my inaccurate choice of words was misleading. Sorry about that! --Haptic-feedback (talk) 06:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Your user page

I have restored your user page as it was before the vandalism - the user who tagged it as "created by a banned user" is a troll who has been blocked. Sorry about that! JohnCD (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)