User talk:MarkDiBelloBiographer

This is MarkDiBelloBiographer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Anthony DiBello (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.markanthonydibello.com/biography. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

Draft:Mark Anthony DiBello may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikipedia thing is very complex I am not an Advertiser I know Mark DiBello my name is Christine Koch, I've known him over 25 years and I already thought he was on Wikipedia so I told him for his birthday and Christmas because contacted him after 10 years Of not knowing him but that doesn't mean I don't follow him on social media and he's not paying me he said sure go for it I'll give you everything you need and I was going to give it to him for her birthday or Christmas present but apparently somehow all this stuff that is in newspapers and videos on him and with government websites seems to pass the citing part of Wikipedia but you guys don't think it's verifiable. MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MarkDiBelloBiographer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MarkDiBelloBiographer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Mark Anthony DiBello, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:MarkDiBelloBiographer, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MarkDiBelloBiographer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Christine Koch and I am not being paid by anyone. I have followed Mr. DiBello's life and career for about 25 years. MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 21:45, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then your choice of username seems rather unfortunate. If I come here to write about a Jane Doe, and choose as my username 'JaneDoeAgent', would it not be reasonable to assume that I represent Jane Doe in some capacity? Yours is not too dissimilar to this scenario. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: So if you're not being paid for this, what is your relationship to DiBello? Part of the reason for asking is that you have uploaded a large number of images of personal nature, such as family photos. Moreover, you have uploaded them as your 'own work'. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, this wiki thing is complex. My name is Christine Koch, Ive followed Mark DiBello about 25 years and thought he was already on wikipedia. He's not paying me! I contacted him in person after 10 years of nothing and he said he'd like to be in it, but the guy runs a charity, hes nearly broke, and he has 1000s of pics on his Facebook page and posts everything, like the pics. Why do you guys assume the worst? You wont find my name online because I am private and DiBello has done a lot of good things, if there is negatives, I am sure you will get them from contributors cause when he does a show, people hate on him. As for this own work thing, I did that because if you don't click that box the photos won't go on page. I wanted to give this to him for birthday and Xmas and now all that work you guys scrubbed for no fair reason. I wrote that I knew him and want to consider him a friend. This site is so complex! I like it and use and it and he said he would be honored for me to help! I just dont get it, now it's like totally deleted! MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Anthony DiBello (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Approx half the sources cited are not reliable. The whole thing looks and reads very promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Anthony DiBello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Anthony DiBello (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since last submission. The latest reason for decline is "sources cited are not reliable"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Anthony DiBello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 06:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And sorry for all the typos but Mark's been tired of helping me and I'm tired of typing so I'm just dictating this. We don't talk that much recently I just thought he was always on Wikipedia and when I saw he was and I just thought he deserved to be and all these criticisms have been inaccurate and negative; and again I don't know who you expect to write about somebody other than somebody who's a follower or fan or a friend, and like I said all his information is online he's got a lot of websites and a lot of social media and if I needed something he would send it to me like a reporter asking for follow-up information; and I'm not a reporter I'm very private and I help him out as a nurse from time to time so I don't understand and again you guys are all very smart in this website is very complex it's hard enough to get done what I got done and now it's all for not MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply][reply]

sorry, was not on Wiki and again NOT being paid or an employee, I offered to write about him and did for 3 long days as a gift and you guys disbelieved everything, none of which I put was false! It's all on the web, in papers, or other media, or pictures and on his websites! MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:58, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply][reply]

This site is soooo complex. I think your judgment is unfair to begin with, I just wrote my relationship to the subject and he was going to do it himself but it's too complex for him so I thought it would help him since I always thought he was on Wikipedia to begin with. He's not paying me I haven't talked to him in months, all his information is online he's got thousands of pictures and articles on Facebook it's just that their scans and screenshots, but nothing I wrote is inaccurate and if it sounds promotional it's because I try to be very positive and the guy's not a bad person but I'm sure if you posted his article some people might say negative things because when he goes on TV shows they often make negative comments. the guy does a lot of different things he's not hugely famous, but I certainly think he qualifies his notable he's been on a lot of TV shows and he seems to know everybody he's got his own website and everything I just don't understand it just seems very unfair and it was a great waste of time and effort over the holiday season, and as far as the other account goes Mark's father is going to help him but he died so Mark just gave me permission to use his account; we were just trying to do the right thing to get in your encyclopedia but you act like we're doing something criminal. Anyways Mark and I were both fans of and he thinks it's a valuable resource for people I'm just sorry you're so negative and inaccurate about me and him

MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:59, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mark Anthony DiBello

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mark Anthony DiBello, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:58, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this is a single-purpose account and is also highly likely to be the same person as or has an association with AnthonyFrancisDiBello (talk · contribs) (who has engaged in similar promotion of the subject in question), I do not believe that allowing you to continue to edit Wikipedia is in the best interest of this encyclopedia. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And sorry for all the typos but Mark's been tired of helping me and I'm tired of typing so I'm just dictating this. We don't talk that much recently I just thought he was always on Wikipedia and when I saw he was and I just thought he deserved to be and all these criticisms have been inaccurate and negative; and again I don't know who you expect to write about somebody other than somebody who's a follower or fan or a friend, and like I said all his information is online he's got a lot of websites and a lot of social media and if I needed something he would send it to me like a reporter asking for follow-up information; and I'm not a reporter I'm very private and I help him out as a nurse from time to time so I don't understand and again you guys are all very smart in this website is very complex it's hard enough to get done what I got done and now it's all for not MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, was not on Wiki and again NOT being paid or an employee, I offered to write about him and did for 3 long days as a gift and you guys disbelieved everything, none of which I put was false! It's all on the web, in papers, or other media, or pictures and on his websites! MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:58, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This site is soooo complex. I think your judgment is unfair to begin with, I just wrote my relationship to the subject and he was going to do it himself but it's too complex for him so I thought it would help him since I always thought he was on Wikipedia to begin with. He's not paying me I haven't talked to him in months, all his information is online he's got thousands of pictures and articles on Facebook it's just that their scans and screenshots, but nothing I wrote is inaccurate and if it sounds promotional it's because I try to be very positive and the guy's not a bad person but I'm sure if you posted his article some people might say negative things because when he goes on TV shows they often make negative comments. the guy does a lot of different things he's not hugely famous, but I certainly think he qualifies his notable he's been on a lot of TV shows and he seems to know everybody he's got his own website and everything I just don't understand it just seems very unfair and it was a great waste of time and effort over the holiday season, and as far as the other account goes Mark's father is going to help him but he died so Mark just gave me permission to use his account; we were just trying to do the right thing to get in your encyclopedia but you act like we're doing something criminal. Anyways Mark and I were both fans of and he thinks it's a valuable resource for people I'm just sorry you're so negative and inaccurate about me and him MarkDiBelloBiographer (talk) 18:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He was never qualified, and never will be. Tell mark that it's time to stop. DACartman (talk) 20:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]